Skip to main content

Security report for silvestrilex.com

Studio Legale Silvestri · Other · Italy

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

52/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Studio Legale Silvestri is a small Italian legal firm providing comprehensive legal consultancy and assistance primarily to private individuals and companies. The firm emphasizes professionalism, availability, and dynamic service delivery across various legal domains including family law, succession, damage compensation, credit recovery, tax law, real estate, consumer guarantees, and arbitration. The website reflects a professional presence with clear service descriptions and multiple contact channels including phone, email, and social media. Technically, the site uses a modern front-end stack with Bootstrap and jQuery but lacks visible HTTPS enforcement and advanced security headers, which are critical for protecting client data and building trust. The cookie consent mechanism is implemented, indicating GDPR awareness, but no explicit privacy or security policies beyond basic privacy and cookie pages are found. Overall, the site is functional and professional but would benefit from enhanced security measures and clearer legal disclaimers.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
60/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching silvestrilex.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
30
Email security
55
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
60
Average
52

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention silvestrilex.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for silvestrilex.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The firm positions itself as a trusted legal advisor in Italy with a focus on personalized client service and a broad range of legal competencies. Its business model revolves around direct client engagement through consultations and legal representation. The presence on major social media platforms suggests an effort to maintain visibility and client engagement. The lack of detailed WHOIS data limits assessment of domain legitimacy, but the consistent branding and contact information support credibility. The firm appears to operate independently without parent or subsidiary companies. Growth potential could be enhanced by improving digital security and expanding online legal resources.

Security posture

The website demonstrates basic security awareness through cookie consent but lacks critical security features such as HTTPS enforcement and security headers. Forms collect personal data but no visible anti-CSRF or input validation mechanisms are evident. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are published, which could expose the firm to risks related to data breaches or cyber incidents. The absence of security.txt and explicit security policies indicates a low maturity in security governance. Immediate improvements in SSL deployment, header configuration, and incident readiness are recommended to protect client data and comply with legal standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate site-wide to secure data in transit.
  2. Add essential security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish clear terms of service and security policy pages to inform users and comply with regulations.
  4. Introduce a security.txt file and vulnerability disclosure policy to enhance transparency and incident response.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and scripts to mitigate vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Studio Legale Silvestri
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Studio Legale Silvestri
Description
Lo Studio Legale Silvestri è una realtà consolidata nell’ambito della consulenza e dell’assistenza legale, offrendo supporto sia in campo stragiudiziale che nel contenzioso, assistendo privati e società con professionalità e disponibilità.
Key services
Diritto di Famiglia, Successioni, Risarcimento Danni e Infortunistica Stradale, Recupero Crediti, Diritto Tributario, Diritto Immobiliare, Garanzia del Consumo e Automotive, Arbitrato, Mediazione, Negoziazione, ADR, Domiciliazioni e Adempimenti
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap, jQuery, Font Awesome, Owl Carousel, Magnific Popup, Google Translate Widget
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
50/100
Good practices seen
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • Contact forms use POST method

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Google Translate
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional legal services site in Italian targeting Italian clients.
  2. Clear contact information and multiple contact methods provided.
  3. Cookie consent mechanism implemented with GDPR considerations.
  4. No visible HTTPS enforcement or advanced security headers detected.
  5. No terms of service or explicit security policy pages found.
  6. Social media presence on Facebook, Instagram, and LinkedIn.
  7. No visible analytics or tracking scripts detected.
  8. Forms collect personal data including name, phone, email, subject, and message.
  9. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a standard front-end technology stack including Bootstrap for responsive design, jQuery for DOM manipulation, Font Awesome for icons, and Owl Carousel for sliders. Google Translate integration supports multilingual accessibility. The site appears moderately performant with good mobile optimization and clear navigation. However, no CMS or backend platform is detected, suggesting a static or custom-built site. Hosting details are not discernible from the HTML. The absence of advanced SEO and accessibility features indicates room for technical improvement. Overall, the technical implementation supports the business needs but requires enhancements in security and SEO for better digital maturity.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with silvestrilex.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review silvestrilex.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.