Skip to main content

Security report for silkplaster.eu

Silk Plaster · Manufacturing · Latvia

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

53/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Silk Plaster is a Latvian-based manufacturer specializing in premium liquid wallpapers, decorative wallcoverings, exterior wallcovers, and premium paints. Established in 1997, the company has over 25 years of experience and positions itself as a global leader in luxury wall coverings. Their business model focuses on manufacturing and direct sales, targeting both B2B partners and retail customers interested in high-quality interior design solutions. The website is built on WordPress with WooCommerce and Elementor, featuring a moderate performance and good mobile optimization. Marketing and analytics are supported by Facebook Pixel, although privacy and cookie policies are currently missing, indicating a compliance gap. Security posture is good with HTTPS enabled, but lacks some security headers and formal security policies. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and content-rich but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and security best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
33/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching silkplaster.eu

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
33
Average
53

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Silk Plaster holds a strong market position as a leading manufacturer in the decorative wallcoverings industry, offering a wide range of products including liquid wallpapers, decorative and exterior wallcoverings, premium paints, rubber paint, and microcement. Their competitive advantages include a broad product palette, factory direct supply, and a flexible pricing policy. The company supports multiple languages and maintains a presence on major social media platforms for marketing and customer engagement. Growth indicators include extensive product variations and international testimonials. The company operates from Latvia and leverages partnerships with courier companies for fast logistics. Strategic observations suggest opportunities to improve compliance and security transparency to strengthen market trust further.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enabled and no visible exposure of sensitive data. However, it lacks implementation of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security, which are recommended to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is published, which could hinder timely reporting and resolution of security issues. The absence of privacy and cookie policies also indicates potential GDPR compliance gaps. The use of Facebook Pixel introduces moderate user tracking, necessitating transparent consent mechanisms. Overall, the security maturity is good but can be improved by adopting comprehensive security policies, headers, and compliance documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with explicit GDPR compliance statements.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection.
  3. Create and host a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and improve incident response readiness.
  4. Provide clear and verified company contact information including emails and phone numbers for customer and security inquiries.
  5. Enhance cookie consent mechanisms to ensure user awareness and compliance with data protection regulations.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Silk Plaster
Description
Silk Plaster is a Latvian company specializing in premium liquid wallpapers, decorative wallcoverings, exterior wallcovers, and premium paints. They offer factory direct supply with flexible pricing and have over 25 years of experience. The company is a leading manufacturer of luxury wall coverings for interior and exterior use.
Key services
Liquid Wallpapers, Decorative Wallcoverings, Exterior Wallcovers, Premium Paints, Rubber Paint, Microcement
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, WooCommerce, Elementor, jQuery, Facebook Pixel, Prime Slider Lite, Jeg Elementor Kit
Frameworks
WooCommerce, Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Facebook Pixel for tracking

Analytics and tracking

Services
Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel, Rank Math SEO
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professionally designed WordPress WooCommerce site with Elementor builder.
  2. Content is rich with product categories, testimonials, and company information.
  3. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap.
  4. No visible contact emails or phone numbers in the provided HTML content.
  5. Social media sharing links are present for Facebook, Twitter, Pinterest, LinkedIn, and Telegram.
  6. Facebook Pixel tracking is implemented for marketing and analytics.
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  8. SSL is enabled and properly configured.
  9. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform using WooCommerce for e-commerce functionality and Elementor for page building. It employs common JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and integrates marketing tools like Facebook Pixel and Rank Math SEO plugin. The hosting registrar is GoDaddy.com, LLC. Performance is moderate with good mobile responsiveness and basic accessibility features. The site uses lazy loading for images and includes multiple CSS and JS assets for enhanced UI/UX. There is room for technical improvement in accessibility and security header implementation. The site structure and SEO metadata are well configured, supporting good search engine visibility.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with silkplaster.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review silkplaster.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.