Skip to main content

Security report for silja.biz

c/o IDPS International Domain Privacy Services GmbH · Manufacturing · Germany

Low risk. 1 critical or high finding in Security headers.

Security score

83/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Silja.biz is a Latvian-language website focused on agricultural machinery sales, targeting agricultural professionals and businesses. The company appears to be a small, established player in the manufacturing sector with a domain age dating back to 2002. The website uses WordPress with WooCommerce for e-commerce capabilities and integrates common tracking and consent tools such as Cookiebot, Google Analytics, and Hotjar. The technical infrastructure is moderate with good mobile optimization but lacks advanced security headers and DNSSEC. Privacy compliance is basic with a cookie consent mechanism but no explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages detected. Contact information is not clearly provided on the site, which may impact user trust and business credibility.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of silja.biz. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
100/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching silja.biz

This scan found 16 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
60
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
100
Average
83

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention silja.biz, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
40
Employees
1
Customers
15
Third parties
24
Weak passwords
0%

Latest record dated 2025-06-30 · 3 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for silja.biz.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –silja.biz2025-06-30

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Brand lookalikes

Add-on

Domains that imitate silja.biz and could be used for phishing or spoofed email, tracked in OffSeq Breach.

Tracked
3
Registered
3
Resolving
3
High or critical
0

Last checked 2026-06-19

Masked preview

  • il•••.bizMediumomission
  • si•••.bizLowbitsquatting
  • s•••.ilja.bizLowsubdomain

See the full lookalike list

A one-off add-on that lists up to 20 of the highest-risk lookalikes of silja.biz with registration, mail-server, certificate and DNS signals.

Select it in the checkout above.

Lookalike data refreshes continuously. Monitoring on Breach alerts you when a variant is registered, gains a mail server or starts serving HTTPS.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the agricultural machinery sector, likely serving a regional market in Latvia. The use of privacy protection in WHOIS is justified for a small business. The website's e-commerce platform suggests direct sales or lead generation. The lack of visible contact details and formal policies may limit customer confidence. The company leverages standard marketing and analytics tools but does not appear to have advanced digital marketing or security certifications. The business model is likely a mix of B2B and B2C sales with a focus on product information and customer engagement through the website.

Security posture

The security posture is moderate. HTTPS is enforced, and the domain status clientTransferProhibited protects against unauthorized domain transfers. However, the absence of DNSSEC and HTTP security headers reduces the overall security level. The site uses Google reCAPTCHA to mitigate bot activity and Cookiebot for cookie consent management, indicating some compliance with GDPR. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, which is a gap in security readiness. The site does not expose sensitive data visibly, but improvements in security headers and DNS security are recommended.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement standard HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish a clear privacy policy and terms of service pages to improve compliance and user trust.
  4. Add visible and verified contact information including company emails and phone numbers to enhance business credibility.
  5. Consider publishing a security.txt file and vulnerability disclosure policy to improve security transparency and incident response readiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
c/o IDPS International Domain Privacy Services GmbH
Description
Silja appears to be a business focused on agricultural machinery (Lauksaimniecības tehnika). The website is in Latvian language and targets customers interested in agricultural equipment.
Key services
Sales of agricultural machinery, Product information and support
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
WordPress, WooCommerce, jQuery, Bootstrap, Cloudflare DNS, Cookiebot, PixelYourSite, Hotjar
Frameworks
Fresh Framework, WooCommerce
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Client transfer prohibited domain status
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • Use of reCAPTCHA for bot protection

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via PixelYourSite), Hotjar
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Hotjar, Google reCAPTCHA, PixelYourSite
Marketing tools
Cookiebot, PixelYourSite, Hotjar
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Content is primarily in Latvian and focused on agricultural machinery.
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found.
  4. Cookie consent is implemented via Cookiebot with detailed cookie categories.
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML content.
  6. Uses WordPress CMS with WooCommerce plugin for e-commerce functionality.
  7. Includes tracking and analytics tools such as Google Analytics and Hotjar.
  8. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  9. No visible security headers in HTML; DNSSEC not enabled.
  10. Domain WHOIS is privacy protected but domain age supports legitimacy.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress with WooCommerce, using a mix of jQuery, Bootstrap, and custom frameworks. It integrates third-party services like Cookiebot for consent management, Hotjar for user behavior analytics, and PixelYourSite for tracking. The site is mobile optimized with moderate performance. However, the lack of DNSSEC and missing security headers indicate technical debt in security best practices. The domain is registered with a privacy protection service, which is common but reduces transparency. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports basic e-commerce and marketing needs but would benefit from modernization and enhanced security controls.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 49/100High34 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with silja.biz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review silja.biz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.