Skip to main content

Security report for silesia-sot.pl

Śląska Organizacja Turystyczna · Government · Poland

High risk. 11 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 3 other checks.

Security score

40/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.silesia-sot.pl represents the Śląska Organizacja Turystyczna, a regional tourism organization focused on promoting the Silesia region in Poland. The site provides information likely aimed at tourists and visitors interested in regional attractions and events. The business model appears to be non-profit or governmental, focusing on tourism promotion rather than commercial sales. The website uses WordPress with the Divi theme, indicating a standard CMS-based infrastructure suitable for small to medium organizations. Technical maturity is moderate with basic mobile optimization and SEO, but lacks advanced security headers and privacy compliance features. Security posture is limited due to missing security headers and lack of visible incident response or security policies. WHOIS data is unavailable, likely due to privacy protection, which reduces trust signals but is common for such organizations. Overall, the site is safe with no adult or questionable content detected, but improvements in privacy, security, and contact transparency are recommended.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching silesia-sot.pl

This scan found 29 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
30
Email security
40
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
40

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention silesia-sot.pl, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
1
Employees
0
Customers
0
Third parties
1
Weak passwords
0%

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for silesia-sot.pl.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization positions itself as a regional tourism promoter in Poland's Silesia region, targeting tourists and visitors. Its competitive advantage lies in localized knowledge and regional focus. The business model is informational and promotional, likely funded by governmental or regional bodies. Revenue streams are not evident from the website, suggesting reliance on public funding or partnerships. The target customer segment includes tourists, travel agencies, and local businesses. Growth indicators are not visible, but the use of modern CMS suggests ongoing maintenance. No explicit partnerships or subsidiaries are identified. Strategic observations include the need for enhanced digital presence with privacy and security compliance to build trust and meet regulatory requirements.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is basic. The website uses HTTPS (implied by URL), but no security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options were detected in the provided content. There is no evidence of exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries, but the absence of security policies and incident response contacts indicates gaps in compliance and readiness. GDPR compliance is not demonstrated due to missing privacy and cookie policies. Data protection officer contact or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are absent. The security culture appears minimal, with no advanced security practices visible. Business impact of these gaps includes potential regulatory non-compliance and reduced user trust. Incident response readiness is unknown.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance security posture.
  3. Publish clear contact information including security incident response contacts and data protection officer details.
  4. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Conduct a security audit and implement monitoring to detect and respond to incidents promptly.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Śląska Organizacja Turystyczna
Description
The website represents the Silesian Tourist Organization, likely a regional tourism promotion entity in Poland focused on the Silesia region.
Key services
Tourism promotion, Information dissemination about Silesia region, Event and attraction listings
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Divi Theme, WordPress
Frameworks
Divi
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. WHOIS data unavailable, indicating privacy protection or registry restrictions.
  2. Website uses WordPress with Divi theme, common for small to medium organizations.
  3. No visible privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the provided HTML snippet.
  5. No security headers or advanced security configurations detected.
  6. No analytics or tracking scripts detected in the provided content.
  7. Content is in Polish language, targeting Polish-speaking tourists.
  8. No signs of adult or questionable content.
  9. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress using the Divi theme, a popular and flexible CMS platform. The technology stack includes jQuery and standard web technologies. Performance is moderate with basic mobile optimization and accessibility features. SEO optimization is basic with meta tags present but no advanced structured data or Open Graph tags detected. Hosting provider details are not available. Technical debt appears low but the lack of security headers and privacy features indicates areas for modernization. Opportunities include implementing modern security standards, enhancing SEO with structured data, and improving accessibility compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with silesia-sot.pl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review silesia-sot.pl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.