Skip to main content

Security report for sikkerhedsbranchen.dk

SikkerhedsBranchen · Other · Denmark

Partial score · DNS & email only

61/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SikkerhedsBranchen is a Danish industry association representing over 270 companies specializing in security and safety. The organization provides certification, training, and industry representation services to its members. The website is professionally designed using WordPress with modern plugins such as Elementor and Yoast SEO, indicating a mature digital presence. The site is well-structured, mobile-optimized, and includes cookie consent mechanisms to comply with GDPR requirements. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and use of reCAPTCHA, though some security headers could be improved. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain trust verification, but the website content and certifications suggest a legitimate and established organization. Overall, the site serves as a credible resource for security professionals in Denmark.

Scanned

3 of 7 checks could not complete. The site may be unreachable or blocking automated scans, so the results below cover only what could be checked. Try a rescan later.

NIS2 and GDPR posture

NIS2 outside view
Not assessed
GDPR outside view
Not assessed

Both readouts depend on the site's pages, which could not be loaded in this scan.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching sikkerhedsbranchen.dk

This scan found 15 issues across 4 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Email security
80
DNS health
70
Network security
20
Average
61

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • GDPR outside view: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The association holds a strong market position within the Danish security sector, offering certifications aligned with international standards such as ISO 9001, ISO 14001, ISO 45001, and ISO 27001. Its business model focuses on membership services, industry advocacy, and knowledge dissemination. The target audience includes security companies, consultants, and clients seeking certified providers. The website's content and navigation support member engagement and information sharing. The organization appears medium-sized with a clear focus on professional standards and industry collaboration. Partnerships and certifications enhance its credibility and competitive advantage in the security market.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security baseline with HTTPS, cookie consent, and anti-bot measures like Google reCAPTCHA. However, explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options are not detected, representing an area for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the HTML content. The use of popular and regularly updated WordPress plugins suggests reasonable maintenance practices. Incident response and security policy information are not publicly available, which could be enhanced to improve transparency and readiness. Overall, the security posture is adequate for an industry association website but could benefit from additional hardening.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Publish a clear privacy policy and terms of service pages to improve legal compliance and user trust.
  3. Provide explicit incident response and security policy information to demonstrate security maturity and preparedness.
  4. Regularly audit and update WordPress plugins and themes to minimize vulnerability risks.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to comply with standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SikkerhedsBranchen
Description
SikkerhedsBranchen er den danske brancheforening for sikring og sikkerhed. Vores organisation består af mere end 270 virksomheder, der hver dag arbejder professionelt med sikring og sikkerhed.
Key services
Industry representation, Certification support, Training and events, Information and knowledge sharing, Member services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Astra Theme, Elementor, Yoast SEO, Google Fonts, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, Cookiebot, Ultimate Member plugin, Gravity Forms
Frameworks
WordPress CMS
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Microsoft Clarity, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity, Cookiebot
Marketing tools
Yoast SEO, Cookiebot
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, limiting domain trust analysis.
  3. Site uses modern WordPress CMS with popular plugins and SEO tools.
  4. Cookie consent and GDPR compliance mechanisms are implemented.
  5. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages detected in main navigation or metadata.
  6. Contact information is available via a dedicated contact page with forms.
  7. Multiple certifications related to security and quality management are listed.
  8. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  9. Website targets Danish security industry professionals and companies.
  10. Good SEO and social media integration observed.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using the Astra theme and Elementor page builder, supported by plugins such as Yoast SEO for search optimization and Ultimate Member for user management. It integrates Google Fonts, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity for analytics, and Cookiebot for cookie consent management. The site loads with moderate performance and is mobile-optimized. The technical stack is modern and widely supported, though hosting provider details are not disclosed. The site uses asynchronous loading for scripts and preconnects to external resources to improve performance. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could be enhanced with additional security headers and performance tuning.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with sikkerhedsbranchen.dk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review sikkerhedsbranchen.dk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.