Skip to main content

Security report for siguldastents.lv

Tenttex · Manufacturing · Latvia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

44/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Siguldas tents, operating under the brand Tenttex, is a Latvian small business specializing in textile architecture and manufacturing. Their product portfolio includes curtains, nets, tents, domes, sun and rain umbrellas, awnings, covers, environmental advertising materials, and cushions. They also provide services such as sewing, welding, and gluing of PVC textile materials, alongside rental services. The company holds official representation agreements with international brands like SPRECH SRL and MITKO, indicating a reputable market position within Latvia and the Baltic region. The website is multilingual, targeting Latvian, English, and Russian-speaking audiences, primarily businesses and individuals requiring textile architectural solutions.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching siguldastents.lv

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
44

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention siguldastents.lv, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for siguldastents.lv right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates a manufacturing and retail business model with additional rental services. Their market positioning is that of a specialized local provider with international partnerships, leveraging European standards for product quality. The website content and product offerings suggest a focus on commercial clients such as event organizers, construction, and advertising sectors, as well as private customers. The presence of official representation for foreign companies enhances their competitive advantage. Revenue streams likely include product sales, custom textile solutions, and rental services. The company maintains active social media presence on Facebook and TikTok, supporting marketing efforts and customer engagement.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate, uses Google reCAPTCHA v3 for bot protection, and integrates Google Analytics for traffic monitoring. However, it lacks visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which could improve protection against common web attacks. No privacy or cookie policies are present, which is a compliance gap under GDPR. There is no evidence of a security.txt file or formal vulnerability disclosure process. The site does not expose sensitive data in the HTML and uses standard WordPress and WooCommerce plugins, which should be regularly updated to mitigate vulnerabilities. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be enhanced with additional best practices and compliance measures.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent banner to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Implement security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen web security.
  3. Establish a security.txt file and a formal vulnerability disclosure process to enhance transparency and incident response readiness.
  4. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Tenttex
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Tenttex
Description
Aizkari, Tīkli, Teltis, Kupoli, Saules sargi, Markīzes, Pārsegi, Vides reklāma, Polsteri. Šūšana, Kausēšana Līmēšana.
Key services
Curtains, Nets, Tents, Domes, Sun and rain umbrellas, Awnings, Covers, Environmental advertising, Cushions, Sewing, welding, gluing of PVC textile materials
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.3.5, WooCommerce 8.7.0, jQuery 3.7.0, Revolution Slider 6.1.7, Google Analytics, Google reCAPTCHA v3, Yoast SEO plugin
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA v3 implemented on forms
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is in Latvian with language switch options for English and Russian.
  3. Business focuses on textile architecture products and services including tents, nets, awnings, and advertising materials.
  4. Contact information is clearly provided in footer including email and phone numbers with language indications.
  5. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found on the main page.
  6. Uses modern WordPress CMS with WooCommerce but e-commerce cart is disabled or hidden.
  7. Google Analytics and Google reCAPTCHA are implemented for tracking and bot protection.
  8. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information.
  9. No certifications or security frameworks mentioned.
  10. Website design and navigation are professional and consistent.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.3.5 with WooCommerce 8.7.0, using jQuery 3.7.0 and Revolution Slider 6.1.7 for interactive content. Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager are used for analytics, and Google reCAPTCHA v3 protects forms from spam. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and uses Yoast SEO for search engine optimization. Performance is moderate, with some room for improvement in loading speed and accessibility. The technical stack is modern and standard for small to medium business websites, but security hardening and privacy compliance need attention to reduce risks and improve trust.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with siguldastents.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review siguldastents.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.