Skip to main content

Security report for siguldaracingteam.lv

Motoklubs "Sigulda Racing Team" · Other · Latvia

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Sigulda Racing Team is a Latvian motorsport club focused on trial and enduro motorcycle sports. The club organizes training sessions, events, and participates in national competitions, positioning itself as a community hub for motorsport enthusiasts in Latvia. The website provides event calendars, team information, and club membership options, targeting local riders and fans. Technically, the site is built on the Webnode CMS platform, hosted via Cloudfront CDN, and employs modern web standards with responsive design and basic SEO. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and cookie consent implemented, but lacks advanced security headers and formal privacy policies, which are recommended for compliance and trust. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain legitimacy verification, though the site content and contact details appear consistent with a legitimate small sports club. Overall, the site is functional, safe, and serves its community well but would benefit from enhanced security and compliance documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching siguldaracingteam.lv

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
35
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The club operates as a small, community-focused entity in the motorsport sector, specifically targeting trial and enduro disciplines. Its business model revolves around membership, event organization, and participation in competitions, with some merchandising via external links. The club maintains active social media channels to engage its audience and promote events. The website reflects a modest but consistent branding effort and provides relevant content for its members and fans. There is no indication of commercial scale or parent company affiliation. The club's growth potential lies in expanding its event offerings and membership base within Latvia's motorsport community.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and includes a cookie consent mechanism, indicating awareness of basic security and privacy requirements. However, it lacks important HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options, which could mitigate common web attacks. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, limiting transparency and preparedness. The absence of a privacy policy page reduces GDPR compliance confidence. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the analysis. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved with standard best practices and compliance documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy to enhance GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Add standard security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to improve protection against common web vulnerabilities.
  3. Create and maintain a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting and incident response.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to comply with standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
  5. Obtain and publish WHOIS domain registration details or ensure domain privacy protection is justified and transparent.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Motoklubs "Sigulda Racing Team"
Description
"Sigulda Racing Team" ir motoklubs, kas apvieno biedrus ar mērķi izbaudīt motosportu kā kopīgu aizraušanos. Mēs organizējam triāla treniņus, pasākumus un startējam sacensībās. 2025.gadā startējam Latvijas čempionātā triālā.
Key services
Triāla treniņi (trial training), Pasākumi (events), Sacensības (competitions participation), Club membership
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Webnode CMS, Cloudfront CDN
Platforms
Webnode website builder
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a motorsport club site with event info and team details.
  2. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error.
  3. HTTPS is enabled and cookie consent is implemented.
  4. No privacy policy or terms of service pages found.
  5. Contact info includes email and phone number clearly displayed.
  6. Social media presence on Facebook, Instagram, TikTok.
  7. Uses Webnode CMS and Cloudfront CDN.
  8. No advanced security headers detected.
  9. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
  10. Content is safe and suitable for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using the Webnode CMS platform, leveraging Cloudfront CDN for content delivery, which supports good availability and moderate performance. The site uses modern HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript with responsive design for mobile optimization. SEO is basic with meta tags and Open Graph data present. No advanced frameworks or backend technologies are evident. The site includes embedded third-party content such as a calendar and social media links. Performance is moderate, with no major blocking scripts detected. Technical debt appears low, but security enhancements and privacy documentation are needed to reduce risk and improve compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with siguldaracingteam.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review siguldaracingteam.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.