Skip to main content

Security report for signatur.dk

Signatur A/S · Other · Denmark

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Signatur A/S is a Danish-owned agency specializing in recruitment and media advertisement services, operating since 1989. They provide a unique integrated platform combining recruitment systems and media services, targeting Danish organizations, especially municipalities. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand with strong client testimonials and a clear service offering. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern JavaScript libraries and includes GDPR-compliant cookie management via Cookiebot. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and email obfuscation, though some security headers and incident response information are missing. Overall, the site is trustworthy and well-maintained, with minor areas for improvement in security transparency and accessibility.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: LinkedIn, Cloudflare, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching signatur.dk

This scan found 17 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
65
Email security
100
DNS health
70
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
40
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention signatur.dk, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
55
Employees
0
Customers
55
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
4%

1 subdomain affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for signatur.dk.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Signatur holds a strong position in the Danish recruitment and media services market, leveraging a combined software and media agency business model. Their long-term client relationships with municipalities and a focus on integrated recruitment solutions provide competitive advantages. The company targets organizations needing streamlined recruitment and advertisement processes. Their digital presence is mature, with active LinkedIn engagement and clear service descriptions. Revenue streams likely include software subscriptions, media placement fees, and consulting services. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain age verification but does not detract from evident market credibility.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to strong security posture with enforced HTTPS, cookie consent management, and email address obfuscation to reduce spam risks. However, the absence of explicit security headers (e.g., CSP, X-Frame-Options) and lack of published security or incident response policies represent gaps. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. GDPR compliance is evident through privacy and cookie policies. Incident response readiness and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are not publicly documented, which could be improved to enhance trust and preparedness.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to strengthen defense against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response information on the website to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Add a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure and improve security communication.
  4. Enhance website accessibility features to meet recognized standards and improve user inclusiveness.
  5. Maintain and regularly update GDPR compliance documentation and cookie consent mechanisms to align with evolving regulations.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Signatur A/S
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Signatur A/S
Description
Signatur is a 100% Danish-owned agency with over 30 years of experience helping clients with handling information and job advertisements and related integrated tasks. They offer a unique recruitment system and media services, combining system provision and media agency services in one portal.
Key services
Annonceportalen (case management system), Rekrutteringssystemet (recruitment tool), Medarbejderportalen (on/offboarding system), Medieekspedition (media advice and placement), Design of job and information ads, Banner design and programming, Website updates and JobNet integration, Text seminars
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.3, jQuery 3.7.1, Slick Slider, Cookiebot (consent management), Moment.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent management via Cookiebot
  • Email addresses obfuscated with Email Encoder Bundle plugin

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Cookiebot session tracker
Marketing tools
Cookiebot, jqSocialSharer
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges
  2. Content is in Danish and targeted at Danish organizations
  3. No forms detected on the main page; contact via email and phone provided
  4. Use of Cookiebot for GDPR-compliant cookie consent
  5. Email addresses are obfuscated to prevent scraping
  6. Strong presence of client testimonials and references
  7. No visible security.txt or incident response info
  8. No explicit terms of service page found
  9. WHOIS data unavailable, likely due to privacy protection
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.3, utilizing jQuery, Slick Slider, and Cookiebot for cookie management. The site loads external resources from trusted domains such as Google Fonts and CDNJS. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility. The use of Email Encoder Bundle plugin protects email addresses from scraping. No major technical debt or outdated libraries were detected. Opportunities exist to improve security headers and accessibility compliance. Hosting provider details are not evident from the content. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and functional user experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 64/100Medium23 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with signatur.dk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review signatur.dk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.