Skip to main content

Security report for signalize.com

Signalize · Technology · Germany

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Email security and GDPR outside view.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Signalize is a German-based technology company specializing in push marketing solutions that enable businesses to engage customers via targeted push notifications across multiple devices and browsers. The company positions itself as a GDPR-compliant, user-friendly platform with integrations for popular CMS and e-commerce systems, serving medium to large enterprises. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with comprehensive content and customer testimonials, indicating a strong market presence in the push notification marketing niche. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern technologies such as TLS 1.3, Lottie animations, and Swiper.js, hosted behind Cloudflare DNS. Security posture is good with strong SSL configuration and no detected vulnerabilities, though improvements like HSTS and OCSP stapling are recommended. Privacy compliance is evident through a detailed privacy policy and GDPR adherence, but the absence of a cookie consent mechanism is a minor gap. Overall, the website is well-structured, performant, and trustworthy, supporting Signalize's business credibility and digital maturity.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of signalize.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
43/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

    • High

      No SPF record found

      SPF helps prevent email spoofing

      What to do: Add SPF record: "v=spf1 include:_spf.yourmailprovider.com ~all"

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching signalize.com

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
92
Security headers
85
Email security
40
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
43
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention signalize.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
9
Employees
0
Customers
9
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
11%

1 subdomain affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for signalize.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Signalize operates a SaaS business model focused on push notification marketing, targeting businesses seeking modern, GDPR-compliant communication channels. The company leverages partnerships with analytics provider etracker and offers plugins for major CMS and e-commerce platforms, enhancing market reach and integration ease. Customer testimonials from reputable clients and ePrivacyseal certification reinforce trust and market positioning. The business emphasizes automation, segmentation, and retargeting features, indicating a focus on advanced marketing capabilities. The website's content and technical infrastructure suggest a medium-sized enterprise with a solid digital presence and growth potential in the marketing technology sector.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced using TLS 1.3 and strong cipher suites, absence of known SSL vulnerabilities, and session ticket support. However, security headers are not explicitly present, and DNSSEC is not enabled, which could enhance domain security. The lack of DMARC records may expose the domain to email spoofing risks. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are found, indicating room for improvement in security governance. Forms are protected with CAPTCHA and GDPR consent checkboxes, supporting secure data collection. Overall, the security measures are solid but could be enhanced with additional headers, DNSSEC, and formal incident response documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Enable HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) with includeSubDomains and preload to strengthen HTTPS enforcement.
  2. Implement OCSP stapling to improve SSL certificate revocation checking and reduce latency.
  3. Deploy DNSSEC to protect against DNS spoofing and enhance domain security.
  4. Add DMARC, SPF, and DKIM DNS records to improve email authentication and prevent phishing.
  5. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy and security.txt file to improve transparency and incident response readiness.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
etracker GmbH
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using Gutenberg blocks and enhanced with plugins such as WPForms and testimonial sliders. It uses modern front-end technologies including jQuery, Swiper.js for carousels, and Lottie for animations. Hosting is supported by Cloudflare DNS, providing DNS resilience and potential CDN benefits. Performance is moderate with a page load time of approximately 5.9 seconds and a page size of ~868 KB, which is acceptable but could be optimized. SEO is well addressed with Yoast SEO plugin, proper meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. Accessibility features like skip links and ARIA labels are present, contributing to good user experience. The site is mobile optimized and has clear navigation. Technical debt appears low, but enabling additional security headers and performance optimizations could further improve the site.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 76/100Low28 findingsView report
  2. 76/100 −1Low28 findingsView report
  3. 77/100Low28 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with signalize.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review signalize.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.