Skip to main content

Security report for sig.biz

SIG Combibloc Group Ltd. · Manufacturing · Switzerland

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SIG Combibloc Group Ltd. is a leading enterprise in the manufacturing sector specializing in innovative and sustainable packaging solutions including carton, bag-in-box, and spouted pouch packaging. The company holds a strong market position as an industry leader with a comprehensive portfolio and a global reach. Their website reflects a mature digital presence with professional design, clear navigation, and a focus on sustainability and innovation. Technically, the site uses modern frameworks such as Next.js and React, hosted on Microsoft Azure, with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. However, the security posture is impacted by an invalid or missing SSL certificate, which is a critical issue that should be addressed promptly. Privacy compliance is well managed with clear privacy and cookie policies and GDPR adherence. Overall, the website is trustworthy and professional but requires improvements in SSL configuration to enhance security.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
43/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching sig.biz

This scan found 12 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
50
Security headers
85
Email security
50
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
43
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention sig.biz, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
195
Employees
3
Customers
69
Third parties
123
Weak passwords
8%

Latest record dated 2025-07-27 · 12 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for sig.biz.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –.sig.biz2025-07-27
  • –investor.sig.biz2025-06-23
  • –cms.sig.biz2025-04-14

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates a B2B business model targeting food and beverage manufacturers and packaging industry stakeholders. It leverages decades of experience and innovation to maintain a leadership position in liquid food packaging. The business model includes product innovation, equipment technology, and services, supported by a strong sustainability agenda. The company maintains active social media channels and provides investor relations and career opportunities through dedicated portals. The domain age and WHOIS data confirm the legitimacy and consistency of the business identity. The company is headquartered in Switzerland and operates at an enterprise scale.

Security posture

The website implements several security best practices including strict transport security, frame options, XSS protection, and content type options. However, the SSL certificate is invalid or missing, which severely impacts the security posture and user trust. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The site lacks explicit incident response or security policy pages and does not provide a security.txt file. The use of modern security headers is positive, but the SSL issue is critical and should be prioritized for remediation.

Recommendations

  1. Immediately fix the SSL certificate to enable valid HTTPS and improve user trust and security.
  2. Enable OCSP stapling and session resumption to enhance SSL performance and security.
  3. Implement DNSSEC to protect against DNS spoofing and improve domain security.
  4. Publish a security policy and incident response information to improve transparency and preparedness.
  5. Add a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and improve security communication.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern React and Next.js stack with Tailwind CSS for styling, hosted on Microsoft Azure. It uses Azure DNS for domain management and integrates Ahrefs and Google Tag Manager for analytics. The site is mobile optimized and accessible with good SEO metadata and Open Graph tags. Performance metrics are moderate, with no explicit performance issues detected. The site uses a custom or proprietary CMS or framework without common CMS signatures. The invalid SSL certificate is a technical risk that could impact user trust and SEO rankings.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with sig.biz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review sig.biz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.