Skip to main content

Security report for siements.com

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website ww38.siements.com is a parked domain with no active business content. It primarily serves as a landing page indicating the domain is for sale, with affiliate links to domain marketplaces. The domain name is a misspelling of a well-known brand, which raises suspicion of typo-squatting or phishing intent. The technical infrastructure is minimal, relying on basic HTML, JavaScript, and iframes loading external content from potentially suspicious domains. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies are present, and no contact or business information is provided. Security posture is weak, with no HTTPS enforcement or security headers detected. WHOIS data is unavailable, indicating the domain is either unregistered or privacy-protected, further reducing trustworthiness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching siements.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
50
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

There is no legitimate business presence on this domain. The domain is parked and monetized through affiliate marketing for domain sales. The lack of WHOIS data and the use of a misspelled brand name suggest the domain may be used for opportunistic or malicious purposes such as typo-squatting. No revenue streams, partnerships, or growth indicators are evident. The target audience appears to be domain investors or opportunistic buyers rather than end customers. Overall, the domain lacks credibility and business substance.

Security posture

The security posture is poor. The site lacks HTTPS enforcement, security headers, and any visible security best practices. The presence of iframes loading external content from unknown domains increases risk. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is available. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR and other privacy regulations. The domain's suspicious nature and lack of WHOIS data further degrade trust and increase risk of phishing or fraud.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate to secure user connections.
  2. Add standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  3. Remove or replace parked domain content with legitimate business information or disable the domain if unused.
  4. Publish privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and other regulations.
  5. Provide clear contact information and business details to improve credibility and trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
This domain appears to be a parked domain with no active business content. The page indicates the domain might be for sale.
Content quality
poor
Branding
inconsistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, JavaScript, iframe
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
20/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
Afternic, YouStarsBuilding
Tracking pixels
YouStarsBuilding tracking scripts
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is a parked domain with no active content
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found
  3. No contact information or business details provided
  4. Contains iframe loading external content from suspicious domains
  5. Advertising and affiliate links present for domain resale
  6. No security headers or HTTPS enforcement detected
  7. WHOIS data unavailable, indicating unregistered or privacy-protected domain
  8. Domain name is a misspelling of a well-known brand, suggesting typo-squatting
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses basic HTML and JavaScript with iframes to load external content. It is hosted behind AWS Cloudfront CDN. No modern frameworks or CMS are detected. The site is minimally mobile optimized and lacks accessibility features. Performance is moderate but limited by external iframe content. There is no evidence of advanced technical infrastructure or security controls. The domain appears to be a placeholder rather than a fully developed website.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with siements.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review siements.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.