Skip to main content

Security report for sie.at

System Industrie Electronic GmbH · Technology · Austria

High risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

41/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

System Industrie Electronic GmbH (S.I.E) is a market-leading specialist in the development and manufacturing of embedded and cyber-physical systems. The company offers a comprehensive portfolio of services including ideation, engineering, production, and quality lifecycle management, targeting industrial clients requiring customized embedded solutions. The website reflects a mature digital presence with professional design, clear navigation, and multilingual support. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern plugins and integrations such as Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and OneSignal push notifications. However, the security posture is weakened by the absence of a valid SSL certificate and disabled TLS protocols, which poses a significant risk to data confidentiality and user trust. Privacy compliance is well addressed with comprehensive cookie consent mechanisms and GDPR-aligned privacy policies. Overall, the business demonstrates strong credibility and market positioning, but urgent improvements in SSL/TLS configuration are necessary to enhance security and trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
0/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching sie.at

This scan found 14 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
90
Email security
50
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
0
Average
41

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention sie.at, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
1
Employees
0
Customers
0
Third parties
1
Weak passwords
0%

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for sie.at.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

S.I.E operates in the technology and manufacturing sectors, focusing on embedded computing and human-machine interface platforms. The company benefits from its affiliation with the Blum Group, enhancing its market credibility. Its business model combines product platforms with tailored services across the product lifecycle, appealing to industrial and medical technology sectors. The website's content and structure indicate a medium-sized enterprise with a clear emphasis on innovation, quality, and customer partnership. The presence of multiple contact channels and compliance information supports customer engagement and regulatory adherence. The company leverages digital marketing and analytics tools to optimize user experience and outreach.

Security posture

The website implements several security headers such as Content Security Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection, indicating awareness of web security best practices. However, the lack of a valid SSL certificate and disabled TLS protocols critically undermine secure communications, exposing users to potential interception and data breaches. The absence of OCSP stapling and session resumption further impacts security and performance. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is publicly available, which could be improved to enhance transparency and readiness. Overall, while some security measures are in place, the critical SSL/TLS issues represent a major vulnerability that must be addressed promptly.

Recommendations

  1. Obtain and properly configure a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS and secure user data.
  2. Enable TLS 1.2 or higher protocols and disable deprecated versions to ensure secure communications.
  3. Implement OCSP stapling and session resumption to improve security and performance.
  4. Publish clear incident response and vulnerability disclosure policies to enhance transparency.
  5. Maintain and regularly update security headers and content security policies to mitigate web threats.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is hosted on Hetzner servers running Apache and uses WordPress CMS with a variety of plugins including Yoast SEO, Contact Form 7, Borlabs Cookie for consent management, and Google Analytics integrations. The site is multilingual with German and English versions. Performance metrics indicate slow loading or missing data, suggesting potential optimization opportunities. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and accessibility features are basic but present. SEO is well implemented with meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. The technical stack is modern but requires urgent SSL/TLS improvements to meet security standards.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with sie.at. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review sie.at.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.