Skip to main content

Security report for sibforms.com

Other · N/a

Partial score · DNS & email only

69/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website sibforms.com appears to be a service portal that redirects users to a login page hosted on account-app.brevo.com, indicating it may be part of a larger SaaS or email marketing platform ecosystem. The domain is registered since 2018 with OVH sas and uses Cloudflare DNS and protection services. However, direct website content is inaccessible due to Cloudflare's WAF, preventing detailed content and security analysis. The lack of visible privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies and absence of contact information reduces transparency and trustworthiness. Technically, the site uses HTTPS but lacks DNSSEC and security headers, indicating room for security improvements. Overall, the site appears legitimate but functions primarily as a login gateway rather than a public-facing content site.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of sibforms.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

  3. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • High

      Domain Expires Soon

      Domain expires in 10 days

      What to do: Renew domain registration before expiration

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching sibforms.com

This scan found 16 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
69

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The domain sibforms.com is likely associated with a business providing form or email marketing services, suggested by the redirect to brevo.com (formerly Sendinblue). The business model appears to be SaaS-based, targeting users needing form integration or email marketing tools. The domain age and registrar information are consistent with a stable business presence. However, the lack of public content and contact details limits visibility into market positioning, revenue streams, or partnerships. The use of Cloudflare indicates a focus on security and availability. No direct evidence of subsidiaries or parent companies was found.

Security posture

Security posture is moderate due to HTTPS usage and domain status protections but limited by the absence of DNSSEC and security headers. The Cloudflare WAF effectively blocks unauthorized access but also restricts content visibility for analysis. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected due to lack of accessible content. The absence of privacy and cookie policies and incident response contacts indicates compliance gaps. Overall, the site benefits from infrastructure security but lacks transparency and documented security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  3. Add clear contact information and incident response channels for security and support.
  4. Implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security.
  5. Improve website content accessibility and SEO to enhance user experience and business credibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Cloudflare detected. Minimal HTML content with JSON redirect to a login page at account-app.brevo.com indicates Cloudflare protection and content blocking. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Content quality
poor
Branding
inconsistent

Technology

Performance
moderate
Mobile
poor
Accessibility
poor
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is inaccessible and redirects to a login page at a different domain.
  2. No visible privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies.
  3. No contact information or business details found on the accessible content.
  4. Domain is registered and active with no privacy protection but minimal public information.
  5. Cloudflare WAF is active, blocking direct content access.
  6. No scripts, forms, or metadata available for analysis.
  7. Website appears to be a portal or service requiring login at a separate domain.
Technical notes

Notes

The website infrastructure includes OVH sas as registrar and Cloudflare for DNS and WAF services. The site uses HTTPS but lacks DNSSEC and security headers. The HTML content is minimal, containing only a JSON redirect to a login page on account-app.brevo.com, indicating the site functions as a gateway rather than a content site. No CMS or frameworks are detectable from the provided data. Performance and mobile optimization cannot be assessed due to blocked content. The technical setup prioritizes security via Cloudflare but limits content availability.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 72/100Medium23 findings · partial scanView report
  2. 72/100Medium23 findings · partial scanView report
  3. 72/100Medium23 findings · partial scanView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with sibforms.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review sibforms.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.