Skip to main content

Security report for siaqnf.com

Sia QNF · Other · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SIA QNF is a small engineering services business that has been registered and operating since 2009. The website is currently under construction and hosted on WordPress.com, utilizing standard WordPress technologies and plugins such as Jetpack and Gutenberg. The site includes advertising scripts from Amazon Ads and Google DoubleClick, and uses Google Analytics for visitor tracking. While the domain is registered since 2015 and shows consistent domain status flags, the website content is minimal and lacks key compliance documents such as privacy policy and terms of service. Cookie consent mechanisms are implemented, indicating some level of privacy compliance awareness. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled but lacks DNSSEC and explicit security headers. No contact information or incident response details are provided, limiting business credibility and user trust. Overall, the site is functional but basic, with room for improvement in content, security, and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • High

      No DMARC record found

      DMARC provides email authentication and reporting

      What to do: Add DMARC record: "v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@yourdomain.com"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching siaqnf.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
30
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
58
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the engineering sector providing chartered engineering services. The website targets a general audience likely seeking engineering consultancy or services. The business model appears service-oriented with no e-commerce or direct sales on the site. Market positioning is small scale or early stage given the minimal web presence. The company leverages WordPress.com hosting and advertising partnerships with Amazon and Google. There is no evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries. Growth indicators are limited due to sparse content and lack of contact details. The advertising ecosystem is standard for WordPress.com hosted sites, with no unique strategic partnerships identified.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS ensuring encrypted communications. Domain registration includes protective statuses preventing unauthorized transfers or deletions. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, which could expose the domain to DNS spoofing risks. No security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options are detected, which are recommended to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. The site lacks published security policies or incident response contacts, which reduces transparency and preparedness. Advertising and analytics scripts increase the attack surface but are standard for the platform. Overall, the security maturity is basic and would benefit from enhanced domain security and explicit security controls.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security.
  2. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve compliance and user trust.
  3. Add explicit security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, etc.) to harden the website against common attacks.
  4. Provide clear contact information including security incident response contacts.
  5. Review and optimize advertising and tracking scripts to balance monetization with privacy compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Sia QNF
Description
Sia „QNF” is registered and operating since 2009. Provides Engineering & Chartered Engineering Services.
Key services
Engineering, Chartered Engineering Services
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Jetpack, Google Analytics, Amazon Ads, Prebid.js, DoubleClick GPT, Emoji Twemoji
Frameworks
Gutenberg
Platforms
WordPress.com
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status includes clientDeleteProhibited, clientRenewProhibited, clientTransferProhibited, clientUpdateProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, WordPress.com Stats
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Amazon Ads, WordAds (WordPress.com advertising), Google DoubleClick
Tracking pixels
WordPress.com pixel
Marketing tools
Jetpack, Prebid.js
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is under construction with minimal content.
  2. No privacy policy or terms of service pages found.
  3. Cookie consent mechanism is present and functional.
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on site.
  5. Uses WordPress.com hosting and standard WordPress technologies.
  6. Advertising and tracking scripts are present, including Amazon Ads and Google Analytics.
  7. No explicit security headers detected in HTML content.
  8. Domain registration and website content timelines are consistent.
  9. No suspicious or malicious indicators found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress.com using the Gutenberg editor and Jetpack plugin, with additional scripts for advertising and analytics. The hosting provider is Automattic's WordPress.com platform, ensuring reliable infrastructure and HTTPS support. Performance is moderate with standard WordPress.com optimizations. Mobile optimization and accessibility are basic but functional. SEO is minimal with basic meta tags and Open Graph data present. The site uses multiple external domains for fonts, ads, and tracking, which is typical but requires privacy considerations. Technical debt is low given the minimal content but modernization opportunities exist in security and compliance implementations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with siaqnf.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review siaqnf.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.