Skip to main content

Security report for shooshtime.com

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 3 other checks.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Shooshtime.com is an adult entertainment website specializing in free amateur porn videos uploaded by users. The site targets adult users seeking free adult content and operates a free content platform business model. The domain is well-established, created in 2002, and registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC, indicating a stable online presence. The website uses modern web technologies such as HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Google Fonts, and Swiper.js for UI components, hosted on a reputable provider. Mobile optimization and user experience are good, though accessibility features are basic. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communications, but lacks advanced security headers and DNSSEC, which are recommended to enhance security posture. No privacy policy, cookie policy, or terms of service were found, indicating potential compliance gaps with GDPR and other privacy regulations. The site uses Google Analytics for user tracking but does not provide a consent mechanism, which may raise privacy concerns. Overall, the website demonstrates moderate technical maturity and business credibility but requires improvements in privacy compliance and security best practices. Adding clear privacy and cookie policies, implementing security headers, and providing contact information would enhance trust and regulatory compliance. The domain's long age and registrar locks support legitimacy, but the absence of contact and policy information limits full trust assessment.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  4. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching shooshtime.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
50
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
53
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Shooshtime.com occupies a niche in the adult entertainment market focusing on free amateur content, differentiating itself from commercial porn sites. Its business model relies on user-generated content and free access, likely monetized through advertising and possibly affiliate marketing. The target audience is adult users seeking free pornographic videos. The site has consistent branding and good content quality for its niche. The lack of visible partnerships or certifications suggests a small independent operation. The domain age and stable registration indicate sustained market presence since 2002. Growth indicators and revenue streams are not directly observable from the data. The site uses Google Analytics for audience insights but lacks transparency on data protection and user consent.

Security posture

The website has a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled, ensuring encrypted data transmission. However, it lacks DNSSEC, which could protect against DNS spoofing attacks. No security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, or X-Content-Type-Options were detected, which are important to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. There is no evidence of a security policy, incident response plan, or security contact information, which limits the site's readiness to handle security incidents. The use of Google Analytics without a cookie consent mechanism may expose the site to privacy compliance risks. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were identified in the provided content. Overall, the security posture is moderate but requires enhancements to meet best practices and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy to comply with GDPR and other privacy regulations.
  2. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  3. Add essential security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common attacks.
  4. Provide clear contact information including security and abuse contacts to improve incident response capabilities and user trust.
  5. Implement a cookie consent mechanism to inform users about tracking and obtain consent for analytics and advertising cookies.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
We are the best free porn tube on the net. We feature only the best amateur sex videos from our users & more.
Key services
Free porn tube, Amateur sex video hosting, User video uploads
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Google Fonts, Swiper.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is an adult content platform specializing in free amateur porn videos
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found in provided content
  3. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses found
  4. Uses HTTPS but lacks advanced security headers
  5. Includes Google Analytics for tracking without visible consent mechanism
  6. Domain is old and registered with a reputable registrar with standard domain locks
  7. No WAF or blocking detected, content fully accessible
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern front-end technology stack including HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Google Fonts, and Swiper.js for interactive UI elements. The site is hosted by GoDaddy.com, LLC, a reputable hosting provider. Performance is moderate with preloading of fonts and images to optimize loading times. Mobile optimization is good with responsive design elements. Accessibility features are basic, with room for improvement in ARIA roles and keyboard navigation. SEO optimization is basic, with meta description and viewport tags present but no advanced structured data or Open Graph tags detected. No CMS or backend technologies were identified from the provided content. The site lacks advanced security configurations and privacy compliance features, which are critical for user trust and regulatory adherence.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with shooshtime.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review shooshtime.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.