Skip to main content

Security report for shoesornoshoes.com

Shoes Or No Shoes · Other · Denmark

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Network security and 2 other checks.

Security score

45/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Shoes Or No Shoes is a niche museum website dedicated to the cultural and artistic significance of shoes, operating as a division of Safety Jogger. The site offers visitors insights into shoe collections spanning ethnic cultures and modern art, and promotes a sneaker design contest. The business model is cultural and educational, targeting general audiences interested in art and footwear. Technically, the site is built on a modern Angular framework with Bootstrap styling, ensuring good mobile responsiveness and user experience. However, the site lacks key privacy and security policies, and does not provide direct contact information, which limits trust and compliance. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled but missing DNSSEC and security headers. Overall, the domain is legitimate and well-established, supporting the credibility of the site.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching shoesornoshoes.com

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
15
Email security
75
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
35
Average
45

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website positions itself as a cultural museum with a unique niche in shoe-related art and history, leveraging its association with Safety Jogger for credibility. Its key services include exhibitions and a sneaker design contest, appealing to both art enthusiasts and sneaker culture fans. The business operates in the 'Other' sector, likely non-commercial or supported by the parent company. The domain age and branding consistency indicate a stable presence. However, the lack of contact and privacy policies may hinder user trust and regulatory compliance. The partnership with Safety Jogger is a strategic asset, enhancing market positioning.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled and domain transfer protection. However, it lacks DNSSEC, security headers, and visible incident response or security policies. No forms or inputs were detected that collect sensitive data, reducing immediate risk. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps, particularly with GDPR. The use of Google Analytics introduces moderate user tracking without clear privacy disclosures. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but requires improvements in policy transparency and technical security controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with GDPR compliance.
  2. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security.
  3. Add standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  4. Provide clear contact information including emails or phone numbers for general and security incident reporting.
  5. Review and disclose data collection and retention policies related to analytics and user tracking.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Shoes Or No Shoes
Description
Shoes Or No Shoes is a division of www.safetyjogger.com. The website presents a museum dedicated to shoes, showcasing collections that span ethnic cultures and modern art, curated by Dirk Vanderschueren. It highlights a sneaker design contest and provides information about the museum and practical visitor info.
Key services
Museum exhibitions, Sneaker design contest, Information about shoe culture and art
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Angular 15, Bootstrap 5, MetisMenu, TinyMCE, Google Fonts (Montserrat, Inter, Material Icons), Google Analytics
Frameworks
Angular
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a museum site focused on shoe culture and art.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly provided.
  4. Uses modern Angular framework and Bootstrap for UI.
  5. Includes Google Analytics for tracking.
  6. No visible security headers or advanced security policies.
  7. Domain is well-established and registered with a reputable registrar.
  8. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern Angular 15 framework combined with Bootstrap 5 for responsive design, ensuring good mobile optimization and user experience. It loads Google Fonts and integrates TinyMCE for rich text editing capabilities, though no forms were detected on the public pages. Google Analytics is used for visitor tracking. The site performance is moderate, with no major technical errors detected. However, the absence of a CMS and limited metadata beyond basic Open Graph tags suggests room for SEO and content management improvements. The hosting provider is not explicitly identified, and no advanced security configurations are visible in the HTML content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with shoesornoshoes.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review shoesornoshoes.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.