Skip to main content

Security report for shilma.com

Parmena and Florian Radut · Manufacturing · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

57/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Shilma.com is a professionally designed website promoting Shilma™, an innovative transparent reusable mask that uses the Coanda effect to redirect expired air downward, reducing germ spread and eyeglass fogging. The business targets general consumers interested in comfortable, transparent face masks suitable for daily use, including at work, school, and sports. The website demonstrates a clear market niche with scientific backing and multiple product styles, positioning itself as a unique player in the personal protective equipment manufacturing sector. Technically, the site is built on Drupal CMS with modern JavaScript libraries and includes essential SEO and accessibility features. It employs HTTPS with good SSL configuration and a cookie consent mechanism compliant with GDPR. However, the absence of WHOIS domain registration data raises concerns about domain legitimacy and ownership transparency. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers are provided, only a contact form, which may limit direct communication. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and cookie consent but lacks advanced security headers and explicit security policies or incident response contacts. No vulnerabilities or sensitive data exposures were detected in the HTML content. The site does not appear to be behind a WAF or blocked by security mechanisms, allowing full content access. Overall, while the website is well-constructed and content-rich, the missing WHOIS data and limited direct contact information reduce trustworthiness. Strategic improvements in domain registration transparency, security policy publication, and direct contact details would enhance credibility and security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, YouTube

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching shilma.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
70
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
35
Average
57

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Shilma.com operates in the manufacturing sector, focusing on a niche product: transparent reusable masks. The business model appears to be direct-to-consumer sales supplemented by partnership opportunities. The company leverages scientific research and innovative technology (Coanda effect) as competitive advantages. Social media presence on Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, and YouTube supports marketing and community engagement. The website content and structure suggest a small-sized enterprise targeting general consumers concerned with health and comfort. No evidence of parent companies or subsidiaries was found. The partnership request form indicates openness to collaboration, potentially expanding market reach. Revenue streams likely include product sales and partnerships. Growth indicators are limited due to lack of financial or founding data.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced with good SSL configuration, and cookie consent mechanisms are implemented, indicating compliance with privacy regulations. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and lack of published security policies or incident response contacts represent gaps. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The missing WHOIS data is a significant concern, potentially indicating domain registration issues or privacy protection that is not justified. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small business website but could be improved with enhanced security controls and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Publish comprehensive security and privacy policies including incident response procedures.
  2. Implement and configure security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Verify and update domain WHOIS registration information to improve legitimacy and trust.
  4. Provide direct company contact emails and phone numbers to enhance communication and credibility.
  5. Consider adding a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure policy to encourage responsible reporting.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Parmena and Florian Radut
Description
Shilma™ is the true first fully transparent reusable mask providing complete protection against the spread of germs by projecting the expired air downwards using technology based on the Coanda effect.
Key services
Manufacture and sale of transparent reusable masks, Partnership opportunities
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Drupal CMS, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, AddToAny sharing, Colorbox
Frameworks
Drupal
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with opt-in
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
AddToAny
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF detected.
  2. Content is focused on a niche transparent reusable mask product.
  3. WHOIS data is missing, which is unusual and suspicious.
  4. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant.
  5. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers found; only contact form.
  6. Social media presence is established on major platforms.
  7. No security.txt or explicit security policies found.
  8. No exposed vulnerabilities or sensitive data detected in HTML.
  9. Website uses Drupal CMS with modern JavaScript libraries.
  10. No advertising networks detected except Google Tag Manager and AddToAny sharing.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Drupal CMS, utilizing modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and AddToAny for social sharing. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and tracking. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and accessibility features like skip links and ARIA labels. Performance is moderate with lazy loading images and efficient CSS usage. No major technical debt or deprecated technologies were detected. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. The site uses HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and user-friendly experience but could benefit from enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with shilma.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review shilma.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.