Skip to main content

Security report for shelfie.at

A&N GesbR · Other · Austria

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

56/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website shelfie.at is currently a coming soon placeholder page for the company A&N GesbR, represented by Philipp Asanger and Manuel Nobis, located in Linz, Austria. The site provides minimal business information, primarily a logo and contact address, with no detailed description of services or products. The business appears to be small and in early stages of web presence development. Technically, the site is built on WordPress using the SeedProd coming soon plugin, with Tailwind CSS and FontAwesome for styling, and jQuery for scripting. It is hosted behind Cloudflare with valid SSL, but the SSL certificate dates appear inconsistent, possibly due to data error. The site performance is slow with a high load time, and lacks modern security headers and HSTS enforcement. Mobile optimization and accessibility are basic. From a security perspective, HTTPS is enabled with a valid certificate, but no additional security headers or policies are implemented. There are no forms or data collection points, reducing attack surface but also limiting user engagement. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies are present, indicating low privacy compliance. DNSSEC and CAA are not enabled, and no vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided. Overall, the site is low risk but also low maturity in security and privacy posture. Strategic recommendations include implementing security headers and HSTS, adding privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR, improving site performance, and expanding business content to enhance credibility and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
15/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching shelfie.at

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
20
Email security
50
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
15
Average
56

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business behind shelfie.at is A&N GesbR, a small entity based in Austria. The website is currently a placeholder with no detailed business model or market positioning disclosed. The lack of content and contact channels suggests early-stage or pre-launch status. No partnerships or subsidiaries are indicated. The company uses Cloudflare for hosting and DNS, and third-party mail services indicated by SPF records. The business sector is not explicitly stated, categorized as 'Other'. The VAT number is provided, supporting legitimacy. No certifications or trust seals are visible. The site targets a German-speaking audience given the language and location.

Security posture

Security maturity is basic. HTTPS is enforced with a valid SSL certificate, but the certificate validity dates appear anomalous and should be verified. No security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, or HSTS are present, which are recommended best practices. DNSSEC and CAA records are absent, reducing DNS security. No forms or user input fields reduce attack vectors but also limit functionality. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is published. Privacy compliance is minimal with no privacy or cookie policies. Overall, the security posture is functional but requires enhancements to meet modern standards and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Enable HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) with includeSubDomains and preload to strengthen HTTPS enforcement.
  2. Implement essential security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options, and Referrer-Policy.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  4. Improve website performance by optimizing resources to reduce load time below 5 seconds.
  5. Add vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible security reporting.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
A&N GesbR
VAT number
ATU72326468
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with the SeedProd plugin for coming soon pages, styled using Tailwind CSS and FontAwesome icons, and scripted with jQuery. Hosting and DNS are managed via Cloudflare, providing CDN and security features, though no advanced DNS security (DNSSEC) is enabled. The SSL certificate is valid but shows unusual future validity dates, which should be checked for accuracy. The site has a slow load time (~16 seconds) and basic mobile responsiveness. No structured data or JSON-LD is present, limiting SEO potential. No forms or interactive elements are implemented, indicating minimal technical complexity. Overall, the technical infrastructure is standard but underutilized, with opportunities for performance and security improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with shelfie.at. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review shelfie.at.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.