Skip to main content

Security report for sharesecurely.com

Altvia · Finance · United States

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

74/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Altvia is a well-established technology company specializing in private capital markets solutions, offering an integrated platform that includes CRM, investor relations portals, virtual data rooms, fundraising tools, and AI-powered analytics. The company targets private equity firms, venture capital, fund of funds, real estate funds, hedge funds, family offices, and wealth managers, positioning itself as a leading provider in the alternative investment technology space. The website reflects a mature digital presence with professional design, clear navigation, and comprehensive content tailored to its audience. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with Elementor and Gravity Forms, leveraging modern marketing and analytics tools such as HubSpot, Google Analytics, Hotjar, and multiple ad networks. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and domain registration stable and consistent, though improvements like enabling DNSSEC and publishing explicit security and privacy policies are recommended. Overall, the site demonstrates high business credibility and trustworthiness with room for enhanced privacy compliance and security transparency.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of sharesecurely.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching sharesecurely.com

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
88
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
74

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Altvia operates in the finance technology sector, focusing on private capital markets. Its SaaS platform integrates multiple functionalities to streamline fundraising, investor relations, and deal management, enhanced by AI capabilities. The company has a strong market position supported by a long domain history and professional web presence. Its business model relies on subscription-based software services targeting institutional investors and fund managers. The partnership with app.sharesecurely.com for LP portal services indicates a collaborative ecosystem. The website's content and structure support lead generation through demo requests and case studies, reflecting a growth-oriented strategy. Advertising and tracking tools are extensively used for marketing and user behavior analysis, indicating a data-driven approach to customer acquisition and retention.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate and domain registration protections such as clientDeleteProhibited and clientTransferProhibited statuses. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a recommended enhancement for DNS security. No explicit security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policies are published, and no incident response contact information is available, which are gaps in security transparency. The site uses multiple third-party scripts and tracking pixels, which increases the attack surface but is common in marketing-focused websites. Security headers are not explicitly visible in the HTML but may be configured at the server level. Overall, the security posture is good but could be improved by publishing security policies, enabling DNSSEC, and implementing additional HTTP security headers.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service accessible from the main navigation or footer.
  3. Create and publish a security policy and incident response contact information, including a security.txt file for vulnerability disclosure.
  4. Implement or verify HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options.
  5. Review and minimize third-party scripts and tracking pixels to reduce attack surface and improve privacy compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Altvia
Description
Altvia scales with your firm. A unified suite of tech for fundraising, IR & deal mangement. A CRM, LP Portal, VDR & more unified by AI built for private capital.
Key services
CRM for private capital, LP Portal & Virtual Data Room (VDR), Data & Analytics, Fundraising & Marketing tools, AI Assistant and AI Agents, Investor Relations, Deal Management
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, Gravity Forms, Google Tag Manager, HubSpot, Hotjar, Bing Ads, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Google Analytics, jQuery
Frameworks
Elementor, Gravity Forms
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS
  • ClientDeleteProhibited and ClientTransferProhibited domain status
  • Cookie consent banner for GDPR compliance

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar, HubSpot, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Bing Ads
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Bing Ads, Facebook Ads, Twitter Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Hotjar, HubSpot
Marketing tools
HubSpot, Hotjar
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed with clear navigation and comprehensive content about private capital technology solutions.
  2. Strong use of modern web technologies and marketing/analytics tools.
  3. Cookie consent banner present indicating GDPR awareness.
  4. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found on the analyzed page.
  5. Contact information is primarily via a detailed contact form; no direct emails or phone numbers found in the content.
  6. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  7. Domain is well-registered and not privacy protected, indicating transparency.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using Elementor page builder and Gravity Forms for data collection. It integrates multiple marketing and analytics tools including Google Tag Manager, HubSpot, Hotjar, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, and Bing Ads. The site is responsive and optimized for mobile devices with good accessibility and SEO practices. Hosting and DNS are managed via Squarespace Domains and Google Cloud DNS respectively. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in script loading and optimization. The technical infrastructure supports a professional and scalable digital presence but should address DNSSEC and security header enhancements to reduce risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 71/100Medium30 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with sharesecurely.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review sharesecurely.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.