Skip to main content

Security report for shameless.com

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

56/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Shameless.com is an adult entertainment website offering free pornographic videos and sex movies. The site features extensive categorization and tagging of adult content, targeting an adults-only audience. The business model appears to be based on free streaming with possible membership or login features. The domain is well-established, registered since 1999, indicating a long-standing presence in the adult entertainment market. Technically, the website uses standard web technologies such as HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, and jQuery, with some UI enhancements like Fancybox. However, the site lacks advanced SEO, accessibility, and mobile optimization features, reflecting a basic technical maturity level. Security posture is minimal with HTTPS enabled but no DNSSEC or security headers detected. There are no visible privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies, nor any contact or incident response information, which raises compliance and trust concerns. Overall, the site is functional but basic, with significant room for improvement in privacy, security, and compliance aspects.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching shameless.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
45
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
53
Average
56

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website operates in the adult entertainment sector, providing free pornographic video content. Its market position is that of a niche adult content platform with a broad range of explicit tags and categories to attract diverse adult audiences. The business model likely relies on advertising, affiliate marketing, or upselling memberships. There is no evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries from the provided data. The site targets mature adults seeking free adult videos. Growth indicators or revenue streams are not visible. The lack of contact information and policies suggests a low emphasis on formal business transparency or compliance. The domain's long registration history supports legitimacy within its niche.

Security posture

The security posture is basic. HTTPS is enabled, which is mandatory for secure communication. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options indicates potential vulnerabilities to common web attacks. No privacy or cookie policies are present, which is a compliance gap, especially under GDPR. There is no incident response or abuse contact information, limiting the ability to report security issues. The site does not appear to use advanced security frameworks or certifications. Overall, the security maturity is low, exposing the site and its users to potential risks.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Enable DNSSEC for the domain to enhance DNS security.
  3. Add essential security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  4. Provide clear contact information including incident response and abuse reporting channels.
  5. Improve technical SEO, accessibility, and mobile optimization to enhance user experience and search engine ranking.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Shameless.com is an adult entertainment website offering free porn videos and sex movies.
Key services
Free porn video streaming, Adult video categorization by tags, models, categories
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, jQuery, Fancybox
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is an adult entertainment platform with extensive tagging of explicit content.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found in the provided content.
  3. No contact information or security policies are visible.
  4. Technical implementation uses standard web technologies but lacks advanced SEO and accessibility features.
  5. No security headers or advanced security configurations detected.
  6. Domain is old and registered with a reputable registrar but lacks DNSSEC.
  7. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected; content is accessible.
  8. Content is clearly adult and NSFW, targeting adults only.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a traditional web technology stack including HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, and jQuery with Fancybox for UI components. The domain is hosted with nameservers from Pananames.com, a known hosting provider. The site has basic mobile responsiveness and accessibility but lacks advanced features or frameworks. Performance is moderate with no explicit indicators of optimization or CDN usage. SEO is basic with minimal meta tags and no structured data or Open Graph tags detected in the provided content. There is no evidence of a CMS or modern frameworks. The technical debt appears moderate, with opportunities for modernization and security enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with shameless.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review shameless.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.