Skip to main content

Security report for shafaqpost.com

Nagitabet Link Daftar Resmi Situs Game Online No.1 di Indonesia · Other · Indonesia

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website shafaqpost.com operates as an affiliate/referral platform for online gambling services primarily targeting Indonesian users. It promotes registration, login, VIP access, and alternative links to gambling sites under the brand 'Nagitabet'. The site uses WordPress with Elementor and is hosted behind Cloudflare CDN. The technical infrastructure is moderate with basic mobile optimization and SEO but lacks advanced security headers and DNSSEC. The security posture is weak due to missing security policies, no incident response contacts, and suspicious WHOIS data indicating a future domain creation date, which undermines trust. Privacy compliance is minimal with basic cookie and privacy policies but no consent mechanisms or GDPR indicators. Overall, the site presents moderate risk due to its gambling content, lack of transparency, and technical security gaps.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  4. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching shafaqpost.com

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
30
Email security
60
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Shafaqpost.com positions itself as a leading online gambling affiliate in Indonesia, offering easy registration and access to gambling platforms. Its business model relies on affiliate commissions from referred users. The site targets mature gamblers in Indonesia, leveraging multiple partner domains for login and VIP services. The lack of clear company information and suspicious domain registration details suggest a low level of corporate transparency. The site uses standard WordPress CMS with Elementor for content management and Cloudflare for CDN and DNS. Marketing is supported by Rank Math SEO and Cloudflare Insights analytics. The affiliate ecosystem includes related domains that provide alternative access and anti-blocking services. The business appears small and focused on the Indonesian gambling market with limited trust signals.

Security posture

The security posture of shafaqpost.com is weak. While HTTPS is enabled and domain transfer is locked, there is no DNSSEC, no security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options), and no published security or incident response policies. The WHOIS data is suspicious with a future domain creation date and no registrant information, raising concerns about legitimacy. No contact channels for security incidents or abuse are provided. The site uses Cloudflare CDN which offers some protection but no WAF or challenge page is detected. Overall, the site lacks mature security practices and transparency, increasing risk for users and partners.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to improve domain security and prevent DNS spoofing.
  2. Implement standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, and X-Frame-Options.
  3. Publish clear security policies and incident response contact information to improve trust and compliance.
  4. Verify and correct WHOIS data to reflect accurate domain registration details.
  5. Add cookie consent mechanisms and enhance privacy compliance to meet GDPR and other regulations.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Nagitabet Link Daftar Resmi Situs Game Online No.1 di Indonesia
Description
Nagitabet menyediakan link daftar resmi situs game online nomor satu di Indonesia. Daftar mudah, game lengkap, aman, dan kemenangan selalu dibayar penuh tanpa batas kapan saja
Key services
link daftar resmi situs game online, login portals, VIP access, alternative access links
Content quality
basic
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, jQuery, Cloudflare
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
45/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Services
Cloudflare Insights
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Cloudflare Insights
Marketing tools
Rank Math SEO
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is an affiliate/referral site for online gambling in Indonesia.
  2. No direct contact information or company details provided.
  3. No visible security or privacy compliance policies beyond basic terms and cookie pages.
  4. No forms collecting user data on the main page.
  5. Multiple external links to gambling-related domains, some suspicious.
  6. No WAF or blocking detected; content fully accessible.
  7. WHOIS data suspicious with future creation date and no registrant info.
  8. Site uses WordPress with Elementor and Cloudflare CDN.
  9. No DNSSEC and no security headers detected.
  10. Content is gambling related, targeting mature audience.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.1 with Elementor 3.28.4, using jQuery and Cloudflare CDN for performance and security. The site has moderate performance and basic mobile optimization. SEO is enhanced by Rank Math plugin with proper meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). However, no advanced security headers or DNSSEC are implemented. The WHOIS data shows inconsistencies with a future creation date, which is unusual and may indicate data manipulation or error. The site uses multiple external domains for affiliate and login purposes, some of which appear suspicious and should be monitored. Overall, the technical infrastructure is standard but requires improvements in security and domain management.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with shafaqpost.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review shafaqpost.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.