Skip to main content

Security report for shadowdrama.net

Ville Pätsi · Other · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Shadow Drama is a personal website primarily showcasing photography by Ville Pätsi. The site serves as a simple portfolio and contact point with minimal content and limited business scope. The website has been active since at least 2007, supported by a domain registered in 2004, indicating a stable online presence. The target audience appears to be general visitors interested in photography. Technically, the site is basic, built with simple HTML and CSS, hosted via NameCheap, and lacks modern web technologies or CMS platforms. Performance and mobile optimization are basic, with no detected analytics or tracking tools. Security posture is minimal; no security headers or DNSSEC are enabled, and HTTPS enforcement is unclear. Privacy and cookie policies are absent, reducing compliance with GDPR and other regulations. Contact information is limited to an obfuscated email link, with no phone or physical address provided. Overall, the site is low complexity, low risk, but would benefit from improved security and compliance measures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching shadowdrama.net

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
50
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website operates as a personal portfolio without commercial business model or revenue streams. It targets photography enthusiasts or contacts for Ville Pätsi. Market positioning is niche and personal, with no evident partnerships or subsidiaries. The absence of business certifications or formal policies suggests hobbyist or personal use rather than commercial enterprise. The domain's long registration period supports legitimacy but does not indicate business scale or growth. No advertising or marketing tools are used, and no analytics data is collected, indicating minimal digital marketing efforts. The site’s ecosystem is limited to an external Flickr link, with no other partnerships or related domains identified.

Security posture

Security maturity is low with no advanced protections detected. The domain lacks DNSSEC, and no HTTP security headers are present, exposing the site to potential risks such as clickjacking or content injection. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR and related regulations. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided. The site uses clientTransferProhibited status to prevent unauthorized domain transfers, which is a positive control. No forms or user input fields reduce attack surface but also limit user engagement. Overall, the security posture is minimal and could be improved by implementing HTTPS enforcement, security headers, and privacy compliance documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Enable and enforce HTTPS site-wide to secure data transmission.
  2. Implement essential security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Add clear privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and enhance user trust.
  4. Provide incident response contact information to improve security transparency.
  5. Consider modernizing the website with updated technologies and accessibility improvements.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Ville Pätsi
Description
Personal or artistic website showcasing photography and contact information.
Key services
Photography
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML, CSS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
40/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a simple personal portfolio with minimal content.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. Contact information limited to an obfuscated email link.
  4. No forms or interactive elements present.
  5. No modern web technologies or analytics detected.
  6. No security headers or DNSSEC enabled.
  7. Domain is old and registered with a reputable registrar.
  8. No advertising or tracking technologies detected.
  9. No social media links except external Flickr photography link.
  10. No signs of adult or questionable content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built with basic HTML and CSS without any detected JavaScript frameworks or CMS platforms. Hosting is provided by NameCheap, Inc., a reputable registrar and hosting provider. The site lacks DNSSEC, which could improve DNS security. No analytics or tracking scripts are present, indicating minimal data collection. Performance is moderate given the simple content, but mobile optimization and accessibility are basic and could be enhanced. SEO optimization is poor due to lack of meta tags beyond charset and title. The site does not use modern frameworks or platforms, indicating technical debt and opportunity for modernization to improve user experience and security.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with shadowdrama.net. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review shadowdrama.net.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.