Skip to main content

Security report for sgsgroup.hr

SGS · Other · Greece

Partial score · DNS & email only

71/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SGS is a globally recognized leader in testing, inspection, and certification services, with a dedicated website for its Greece operations. The company positions itself as the world's leading provider in its sector, targeting a broad audience requiring quality assurance and compliance services. The website demonstrates a professional and consistent brand presence with good content quality and user experience. Technically, the site leverages modern frameworks such as Next.js and Tailwind CSS, and integrates multiple Google Tag Manager scripts for analytics and marketing purposes, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. However, the absence of visible privacy and cookie policies, as well as missing WHOIS data, limits the assessment of compliance and domain legitimacy. Security posture is moderate with no detected security headers or explicit security policies, suggesting room for improvement in hardening the website. Overall, the site is accessible, safe, and professional but would benefit from enhanced transparency and security measures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
100/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching sgsgroup.hr

This scan found 9 issues across 4 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
100
Average
71

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

SGS operates in the testing, inspection, and certification industry, serving clients who require compliance verification and quality assurance across various sectors. The business model is service-oriented, focusing on providing essential third-party validation services. The company enjoys a leading market position with a strong global brand. The website targets enterprises and organizations needing trusted certification services, reflecting an enterprise-sized operation. The digital presence is supported by advanced web technologies and analytics tools, indicating investment in digital marketing and customer engagement. The lack of detailed WHOIS data and contact information on the site suggests a cautious approach to public exposure of registration details, possibly for privacy or security reasons. No direct partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the website content.

Security posture

The current security posture of the website is moderate. HTTPS is presumably enabled (implied by the URL scheme and modern web standards), but no explicit security headers were detected in the provided data. The site lacks visible privacy and cookie policies, which are critical for GDPR compliance and user trust. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is present, limiting transparency in security management. The extensive use of Google Tag Manager scripts indicates active user tracking, which should be balanced with strong privacy controls. The absence of WHOIS data reduces the ability to verify domain ownership and legitimacy, which is a minor risk factor. Recommendations include implementing security headers, publishing privacy and cookie policies, and providing clear security contact channels to enhance trust and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to harden the website against common attacks.
  3. Establish and publicize a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Provide clear contact information including security incident response contacts to improve transparency and responsiveness.
  5. Verify and update WHOIS information to ensure domain registration data is accurate and publicly accessible for trust verification.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SGS
Description
We are the world's leading Testing, Inspection and Certification company.
Key services
Testing, Inspection, Certification
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Web Vitals, Next.js, Tailwind CSS
Frameworks
Next.js, Tailwind CSS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
50/100

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and content-rich for a global testing and certification company.
  2. No WHOIS data available from the provided raw output, limiting domain registration trust analysis.
  3. No visible privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found in the provided HTML snippet.
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the provided content.
  5. Uses modern web technologies including Next.js and Tailwind CSS.
  6. Includes multiple Google Tag Manager scripts indicating extensive analytics and marketing tracking.
  7. No security headers or explicit security policies detected in the provided data.
  8. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected; site content is accessible.
  9. Content is safe for general audiences with no adult or questionable material.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack including Next.js for server-side rendering and Tailwind CSS for styling, which supports responsive and performant design. Multiple Google Tag Manager scripts are embedded, indicating sophisticated analytics and marketing tracking capabilities. The site appears to be well-structured with good SEO metadata and Open Graph tags for social media sharing. Performance is moderate, with potential for optimization in loading times and accessibility features. No CMS or hosting provider details were explicitly found. The lack of security headers and privacy policies represents technical debt and compliance risk. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could benefit from enhanced security and privacy features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with sgsgroup.hr. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review sgsgroup.hr.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.