Skip to main content

Security report for sgit.se

Försäkringskassan · Government · Sweden

Low risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

79/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.sgit.se serves as a portal for Försäkringskassan's coordinated and secure state IT operations, offering standardized IT services tailored for Swedish government agencies. The site presents a professional and consistent brand image aligned with government standards, focusing on services such as application management, IT workplace solutions, and e-identity services for the public sector. The technical infrastructure is built on SiteVision CMS with jQuery and integrates Matomo analytics for user tracking. While the site is mobile-optimized and accessible, it lacks explicit privacy and cookie policies, and no security headers were detected, indicating areas for security enhancement. The absence of WHOIS data for the exact domain suggests it may be a subdomain or alias, but the strong association with Försäkringskassan supports its legitimacy. Overall, the site demonstrates a solid business and technical foundation with room for improved privacy compliance and security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching sgit.se

This scan found 15 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
85
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
79

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Försäkringskassan operates as a key government IT service provider in Sweden, delivering IT infrastructure and application management services to other government entities under a fee-based model. The website targets Swedish public sector organizations, emphasizing secure and coordinated IT operations. The business model leverages government mandates to provide centralized IT services, enhancing digital transformation efforts across agencies. The presence of case studies and detailed service descriptions indicates a mature service portfolio and a collaborative ecosystem with other government bodies. The lack of visible social media or external partnerships on the site suggests a focused government-centric approach. The company benefits from strong trust signals through official branding and government association.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and integrates secure login areas for support and fault reporting, reflecting a baseline security posture. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security reduces defense-in-depth. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The site lacks published incident response or vulnerability disclosure information, which could improve transparency and readiness. Privacy compliance is limited by missing explicit privacy and cookie policies, potentially impacting GDPR adherence. Overall, the security maturity is moderate, with recommendations to enhance header configurations, privacy disclosures, and incident response visibility.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to strengthen security posture.
  3. Provide explicit incident response and vulnerability disclosure contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  4. Enhance SSL/TLS configuration visibility and ensure best practices are followed.
  5. Consider publishing certifications or compliance attestations to reinforce trust and credibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Försäkringskassan
Description
Försäkringskassan offers a portfolio of standardized IT services tailored for Swedish government agencies, focusing on secure and coordinated state IT operations. They provide support, management, and fault reporting services to collaborating authorities.
Key services
Enstaka it-tjänster (Single IT services), Applikationsåtagande (Application management), It-arbetsplats (IT workplace services), EFOS (E-identity for public sector)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, SiteVision CMS, Matomo Analytics
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by canonical URL https://www.sgit.se)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Support and fault reporting links secured behind login

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo
Marketing tools
Matomo Analytics
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a government IT service portal for Swedish authorities.
  2. Content is in Swedish language and well structured.
  3. No privacy or cookie policies explicitly found on main pages.
  4. Contact email is a government domain email.
  5. No signs of malicious or adult content.
  6. No WHOIS data for the exact domain, possibly a subdomain or alias.
  7. Uses Matomo analytics with cookie consent not explicitly visible.
  8. No visible security headers in HTML source.
  9. Site uses SiteVision CMS and jQuery.
  10. No visible social media links.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using the SiteVision CMS platform, leveraging jQuery and custom JavaScript modules. It integrates Matomo analytics for user tracking, indicating a preference for privacy-conscious analytics tools. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and accessible navigation. Performance appears moderate with preloaded scripts and stylesheets. No major technical debt or deprecated libraries were detected. The absence of visible security headers and privacy mechanisms suggests areas for modernization. Hosting appears to be managed by Försäkringskassan or related government infrastructure, ensuring stability and compliance with government IT standards.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with sgit.se. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review sgit.se.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.