Skip to main content

Security report for sevciktomas.cz

Tomáš Ševčík · Technology · Czech Republic

High risk. 11 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Network security and 2 other checks.

Security score

43/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Tomáš Ševčík operates as an independent freelance web designer and developer based in the Czech Republic, offering a broad range of web-related services including design, development, optimization, security, and custom WordPress plugin creation. With over 15 years of experience and a portfolio of more than 200 projects and 300 satisfied clients, the business positions itself as a trusted expert in the web design industry. The website is professionally designed, mobile-optimized, and rich in content, targeting clients who seek effective and profitable web solutions. Technically, the site leverages WordPress CMS with modern plugins and frameworks such as Bootstrap, jQuery, and FontAwesome, and integrates analytics and marketing tools like Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel with GDPR-compliant consent mechanisms. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent management, though some security headers are missing and no explicit security policy or incident response contacts are provided. The domain WHOIS data is unavailable, which reduces trust from a domain registration perspective but does not detract from the professional presentation and business legitimacy evident on the site.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of sevciktomas.cz. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching sevciktomas.cz

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
15
Email security
50
DNS health
80
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
25
Average
43

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the technology sector, specifically in web design and development services, targeting small to medium-sized enterprises and individuals needing professional web presence. The freelance model allows flexibility and personalized service, supported by a strong portfolio and client testimonials. The company maintains active social media channels and provides comprehensive contact information, enhancing customer engagement and trust. The absence of WHOIS data is a notable anomaly but may be due to privacy or technical reasons. The business demonstrates good compliance with GDPR and cookie regulations, indicating awareness of legal requirements in its operating region.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and cookie consent management, reflecting a baseline security and privacy compliance. However, the lack of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options suggests room for improvement in hardening the site against common web attacks. No visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The absence of a published security policy or incident response contact limits transparency and preparedness communication. Overall, the security posture is moderate to good but could benefit from enhanced security controls and documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Referrer-Policy to improve site security.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and provide incident response contact information to enhance trust and preparedness.
  3. Regularly audit and update WordPress core and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  4. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  5. Enhance monitoring and logging to detect and respond to potential security incidents promptly.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Tomáš Ševčík
VAT number
CZ8712054571
Registration number
88001121
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Tomáš Ševčík
Description
Jsem nezávislý webdesignér a webový vývojář. Přes 12 let tvořím úspěšné webové stránky, které mají za cíl přinést mým klientům zisk.
Key services
Web design and development, Web optimization and consulting, Security and malware removal, Website speed improvement, Website translation, Website management, Custom WordPress plugin development
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.7.2, PHP, jQuery, Bootstrap, FontAwesome, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Complianz GDPR plugin, WP Rocket
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent management
  • Use of Facebook Pixel and Google Analytics with consent
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design.
  2. No WHOIS data available, which is unusual and reduces domain trust.
  3. Strong GDPR and cookie compliance with visible consent management.
  4. Multiple social media and contact channels provided.
  5. No visible security policy or incident response information.
  6. Use of modern web technologies and performance optimization plugins.
  7. No signs of adult or inappropriate content.
  8. No detected WAF or blocking mechanisms.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS version 6.7.2, utilizing a modern tech stack including Bootstrap for responsive design, jQuery for scripting, and FontAwesome for icons. Performance optimization is evident through the use of WP Rocket caching and lazy loading of images. SEO is well addressed with Yoast SEO plugin metadata and structured data in JSON-LD format. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible with good navigation clarity. No hosting provider details were found in the content. The technical implementation is robust with minor opportunities for security header enhancements and potential hosting transparency improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 39/100High39 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with sevciktomas.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review sevciktomas.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.