Skip to main content

Security report for serveris.lv

SIA Datateks · Telecommunications · Latvia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Network security and 1 other check.

Security score

49/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Serveris.lv, operated by SIA Datateks, is a Latvian hosting service provider established in 2002, offering web hosting, virtual servers, SSL certificates, and server rental services. The company targets Latvian businesses and individuals requiring reliable and professional hosting solutions with 24/7 technical support. Their market position is solid within the local telecommunications sector, supported by long-term customer relationships and positive testimonials. Technically, the website runs on Apache with PHP 5.6.40, uses common JavaScript libraries like jQuery, and integrates marketing and analytics tools such as Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and Cookiebot for cookie consent. The SSL certificate is valid but lacks modern TLS protocol support, and security headers are minimal. No explicit privacy or security policies are published, though cookie consent is implemented. Contact information is clearly provided, including phone, email, WhatsApp, and Skype.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
0/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching serveris.lv

This scan found 19 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
20
Email security
100
DNS health
85
Network security
60
GDPR outside view
0
Average
57
After the cap
49

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Serveris.lv operates a service-based business model focused on IT infrastructure and hosting services in Latvia. Their competitive advantage lies in their long-standing presence since 2002, 24/7 support, and a comprehensive portfolio including domain registration, hosting, virtual servers, and SSL certificates. The company leverages digital marketing tools and maintains multilingual support (Latvian, Russian, English) to broaden its audience. Revenue streams likely come from subscription hosting plans, server rentals, and SSL certificate sales. The partnership ecosystem includes internal subdomains for client account management and email authentication. Strategic observations suggest a stable medium-sized enterprise with opportunities to modernize technology and enhance security posture.

Security posture

The current security posture is moderate with a valid SSL certificate issued by RapidSSL but lacking support for modern TLS versions (TLS 1.2 or 1.3). The server runs outdated PHP 5.6.40, which is end-of-life and poses security risks. Security headers are limited to basic cache control and cookie settings, with no advanced headers like CSP or HSTS enabled. DNSSEC and CAA records are not configured, reducing domain security. No published security policy, incident response plan, or vulnerability disclosure program is found. Cookie consent is implemented via Cookiebot, indicating some privacy awareness. Overall, the site demonstrates basic security hygiene but requires significant improvements to meet modern standards and compliance requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Upgrade PHP to a supported and secure version (e.g., PHP 8.x) to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
  2. Enable HSTS with includeSubDomains and preload flags to enforce HTTPS and prevent downgrade attacks.
  3. Implement additional security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Configure DNSSEC and CAA records to enhance domain name system security and certificate issuance control.
  5. Publish comprehensive privacy, security, and incident response policies on the website to improve transparency and compliance.
Technical notes

Notes

The website infrastructure is based on Apache web server with PHP 5.6.40, which is outdated and unsupported. Frontend technologies include jQuery, jQuery UI, FancyBox, and custom JavaScript for UI and analytics integration. The site uses Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and Google Tag Manager for tracking and marketing. Cookie consent is managed by Cookiebot. The SSL certificate is valid but does not support modern TLS protocols, limiting secure communication capabilities. Performance metrics indicate fast load times, though no resource or page size data is available. The CMS appears custom or proprietary with no common CMS detected. The hosting provider is likely local or self-hosted given the IP address and domain naming. Opportunities exist to modernize the tech stack, improve security configurations, and enhance accessibility and SEO further.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with serveris.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review serveris.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.