Skip to main content

Security report for sepekov.eu

Městys Sepekov · Government · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 1 other check.

Security score

50/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Městys Sepekov operates as a local government municipality in the Czech Republic, providing official information, public services, cultural event updates, and administrative contacts to residents and visitors. The website serves as a comprehensive portal for municipal news, local services, and community engagement. The site is well-structured with clear navigation and is optimized for mobile devices, reflecting a moderate level of digital maturity. The technical infrastructure leverages common web technologies such as jQuery, Bootstrap, and Swiper.js, integrated within a CMS platform likely provided by Galileo Corporation. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, though explicit security headers and incident response information are absent. Overall, the website presents a trustworthy and professional front for the municipality, with room for improvement in security best practices and transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching sepekov.eu

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
30
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
10
Average
50

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The municipality positions itself as a small government entity focused on serving its local population through transparent communication and accessible services. Its partnerships with local schools, libraries, and payment gateways indicate a collaborative ecosystem supporting community needs. The business model is public service-oriented, with no commercial revenue streams evident. The website's content and structure suggest a focus on residents and local stakeholders, with cultural and administrative information prioritized. Growth indicators are limited given the nature of the entity, but the digital presence is stable and consistent. Strategic observations include the opportunity to enhance security policies and incident response readiness to align with modern compliance standards.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a baseline security posture with HTTPS enabled and a cookie consent mechanism in place, supporting GDPR compliance. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No vulnerability disclosures or incident response contacts are published, which could hinder timely security issue reporting. The use of third-party libraries is current but should be regularly audited to prevent vulnerabilities. Data protection practices appear adequate for the site's scope, but formal security policies and certifications are not evident. Overall, the security maturity is moderate, suitable for a small government site but improvable.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program, possibly via a security.txt file, to facilitate responsible reporting.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and scripts to mitigate risks from outdated components.
  5. Enhance privacy compliance disclosures with more detailed data retention and processing information.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Úřad městyse Sepekov
VAT number
CZ00250091
Registration number
00250091
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Městys Sepekov
Description
Official website of Městys Sepekov, a local government municipality providing information about the town, its history, services, cultural events, and administrative office.
Key services
Municipal news and updates, Public services information, Cultural event calendar, Contact and administrative information, Online forms and e-podatelna (electronic filing)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap 4.4.1, Swiper.js, Highslide JS, Mmenu.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of cookie consent mechanism

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and navigation
  2. No WHOIS data available due to EURid privacy policy
  3. Site uses modern JavaScript libraries and responsive design
  4. Contact information is clearly presented and consistent
  5. No signs of malicious or suspicious activity
  6. Cookie consent and GDPR statement present
  7. No explicit security headers detected in provided data
  8. No analytics or tracking scripts detected in HTML content
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a CMS platform with a modern front-end stack including jQuery, Bootstrap 4, Swiper.js for sliders, and Highslide for image viewing. The site is mobile responsive and includes accessibility features such as ARIA labels and keyboard navigation support. Performance is moderate, with some external dependencies loaded from CDNs. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and structured navigation. However, no advanced frameworks or server-side technologies are explicitly identified. Hosting details are not disclosed. The technical setup is stable but could benefit from performance optimizations and enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with sepekov.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review sepekov.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.