Skip to main content

Security report for seod.cz

Společnost eventových organizátorů a dodavatelů, z.s. · Other · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

57/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Společnost eventových organizátorů a dodavatelů, z.s. (SEOD) is a Czech non-profit association dedicated to supporting and developing the event industry by connecting event organizers and suppliers. The website serves as a platform for sharing knowledge, networking, and promoting the event business sector. It targets professionals and enthusiasts in the event management field, offering membership opportunities and educational resources. The organization positions itself as a community-driven entity fostering growth and collaboration within the event industry in the Czech Republic. Technically, the website is built on the Solidpixels CMS platform, utilizing modern web technologies such as Google Tag Manager for analytics, Google Fonts for typography, and various JavaScript libraries for enhanced user experience. The site is mobile-optimized and features a cookie consent mechanism compliant with GDPR. Performance is moderate with good SEO practices and basic accessibility features. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and provides cookie consent controls but lacks visible security headers and explicit security or incident response policies. The absence of WHOIS registration data is a notable concern, impacting domain transparency and trustworthiness. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected, but improvements in security headers and policy disclosures are recommended. Overall, SEOD presents a professional and trustworthy online presence for a niche non-profit organization, with room for enhancement in security posture and domain registration transparency to strengthen stakeholder confidence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching seod.cz

This scan found 11 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
80
Email security
50
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
57

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

SEOD operates as a specialized non-profit association within the event management sector in the Czech Republic. Its competitive advantage lies in its community focus, offering networking, education, and shared resources to event professionals. The business model revolves around membership fees and event-related services, targeting event organizers, suppliers, and enthusiasts. Growth indicators include active social media engagement and a clear call to action for membership. The partnership ecosystem includes collaboration with design and development firms such as Solidpixels. Strategic observations suggest opportunities to expand digital presence and formalize compliance and security policies to enhance credibility and market positioning.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is moderate. HTTPS is properly implemented, and cookie consent mechanisms align with GDPR requirements. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No incident response or security policy pages are present, limiting transparency and preparedness. Data protection practices appear basic, with no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. The organization should prioritize implementing security headers, publishing security policies, and establishing incident response contacts to improve security culture and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  2. Publish explicit security and privacy policy pages detailing data protection practices and incident response procedures.
  3. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to identify and remediate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Increase domain registration transparency by ensuring WHOIS data is complete and publicly available to strengthen trust.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Společnost eventových organizátorů a dodavatelů, z.s.
Registration number
19155573
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Společnost eventových organizátorů a dodavatelů, z.s.
Description
Spolek přátel eventů, společnost eventových organizátorů a dodavatelů, z.s., zaměřená na podporu a rozvoj eventového průmyslu, sdílení zkušeností, vzdělávání a propojení profesionálů v oblasti eventů.
Key services
sdílení zkušeností, vzdělávání, organizace akcí, členství a networking
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Google Fonts, Solidpixels CMS, JavaScript ES6, Fancybox Lightbox, Flatpickr, Leaflet Maps
Frameworks
Solidpixels CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with granular options

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is in Czech language and targeted at event professionals and enthusiasts.
  3. No explicit privacy or security policy pages found, but cookie consent is implemented.
  4. WHOIS data is missing, which is a significant gap in domain transparency.
  5. Website uses modern web technologies and a proprietary CMS (Solidpixels).
  6. Contact information is clearly provided in the footer with email, phone, and physical address.
  7. Social media presence includes LinkedIn and Facebook profiles.
  8. No forms detected on the homepage; membership application likely on a separate page.
  9. No visible security headers detected in provided data.
  10. SSL is enabled and appears properly configured.
Technical notes

Notes

The website leverages a modern CMS (Solidpixels) with integration of Google Tag Manager for analytics and Google Fonts for typography. JavaScript libraries such as Fancybox and Flatpickr enhance interactivity. The site is mobile responsive with good SEO metadata and Open Graph tags for social sharing. Performance is moderate, with room for optimization in loading speed and accessibility. No major technical debt is evident, but the absence of security headers and incomplete WHOIS data represent technical risks that could impact business operations and trust.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with seod.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review seod.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.