Skip to main content

Security report for seoai.run

SEOAI · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SEOAI.run is a small technology company offering an AI-powered SEO checker tool designed to help businesses optimize their websites by analyzing keyword density and providing actionable SEO insights. The platform operates on a freemium SaaS model with tiered subscription plans, targeting businesses and website owners seeking affordable and effective SEO solutions. The website is professionally designed using modern web technologies such as Next.js and React, integrating secure payment gateways like Stripe and Paddle, and analytics tools including Microsoft Clarity and Google Tag Manager. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and no exposed sensitive data, though explicit security headers and cookie consent mechanisms could be improved. WHOIS data is limited due to TLD restrictions and privacy protection, but the domain appears legitimate and actively maintained. Overall, SEOAI.run presents a trustworthy and functional online service with room for enhancement in privacy compliance and security best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching seoai.run

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
54
Security headers
35
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

SEOAI.run positions itself competitively in the SEO tools market by offering advanced AI-driven keyword detection and SEO analysis at affordable prices, including a free tier. Its business model leverages subscription revenue with clear pricing transparency. The platform targets a broad range of businesses from startups to larger enterprises, emphasizing ease of use and actionable insights. Partnerships with payment processors Paddle and Stripe support monetization, while analytics integrations enable user behavior tracking. The company maintains active user engagement through feedback channels and community presence (Discord). The lack of detailed registrant information is typical for privacy-protected domains but does not detract from the professional presentation and service offering.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid security foundation with HTTPS enabled and secure payment integrations. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options represents an area for improvement to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. No sensitive data leakage or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The site lacks a published security policy or incident response information, which could enhance trust and preparedness. Privacy compliance is partial, with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism detected, potentially impacting GDPR adherence. Overall, the security posture is good but could be strengthened by implementing recommended headers and privacy controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement explicit security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner or mechanism to comply with GDPR and improve user privacy transparency.
  3. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response plan to demonstrate commitment to security and provide clear contact channels for security issues.
  4. Enhance accessibility features and conduct regular security audits to identify and remediate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Maintain transparency in business information and consider adding phone contact or physical address to improve business credibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SEOAI
Description
SEO AI is an SEO keyword detection tool implemented using AI technology. It helps businesses analyze the density of keywords and calculates keyword scores based on expertise. It also generates articles by inputting a website URL to begin detection.
Key services
SEO keyword detection, AI keyword generation, SEO analysis reports, Article generation, SEO checklist and scoring
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Next.js, React, Stripe, Paddle, ProfitWell, Microsoft Clarity
Frameworks
Next.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of secure payment libraries (Stripe, Paddle)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Microsoft Clarity, Google Analytics (via GTM)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity
Marketing tools
ProfitWell
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge
  2. Content is focused on SEO AI tool with clear business purpose
  3. Pricing plans are transparent and competitive
  4. Contact email is provided in footer
  5. No phone numbers or physical addresses found
  6. No explicit cookie consent mechanism detected
  7. Security headers could be improved
  8. Use of modern web technologies and payment integrations
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected
Technical notes

Notes

SEOAI.run is built on a modern technology stack centered around Next.js and React, enabling server-side rendering and efficient client-side interactivity. The site integrates third-party services for payments (Stripe, Paddle) and analytics (Microsoft Clarity, Google Tag Manager), indicating a mature digital infrastructure. Performance is moderate with deferred loading of scripts and preloading of critical CSS. Mobile optimization is good with responsive design elements. The site lacks a traditional CMS, suggesting a custom-built solution tailored for SEO AI services. Technical debt appears low, but improvements in security headers and privacy compliance are recommended to reduce risk and enhance user trust.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with seoai.run. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review seoai.run.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.