Security report for sentinelone.com
SentinelOne · Technology · United States
SentinelOne is a leading enterprise cybersecurity company specializing in AI-powered protection across endpoints, cloud, identity, and data. The company positions itself as a market leader with a comprehensive platform that integrates advanced AI capabilities to secure organizations against evolving threats. Their website reflects a mature digital presence with extensive product information, customer testimonials, and industry recognitions such as Gartner Magic Quadrant leadership and MITRE ATT&CK evaluation success. Technically, the website leverages modern web technologies including WordPress CMS, advanced analytics tools like Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, and New Relic, and marketing automation platforms such as Marketo and Calibermind. The site is well-optimized for performance, mobile responsiveness, and SEO, indicating a high level of digital maturity. From a security perspective, SentinelOne enforces HTTPS, employs security best practices in forms and cookies, and monitors for security policy violations. While explicit security policy and incident response contact pages are not found, the overall posture is strong with no evident vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. Privacy compliance is robust with clear privacy and cookie policies and GDPR adherence. Overall, SentinelOne's website demonstrates a high level of professionalism, trustworthiness, and technical sophistication, supporting its position as a trusted cybersecurity provider. Strategic recommendations include publishing dedicated security policies and vulnerability disclosure information to further enhance transparency and trust.
Scanned
NIS2 and GDPR posture
- NIS2 outside view
- Not assessed
- GDPR outside view
- Not assessed
Both readouts depend on the site's pages, which could not be loaded in this scan.
Priority findings
2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
SSL/TLS
TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.
- High
Weak Protocols Supported
Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions
- CWE-327
- OWASP A04:2025
- ASVS V12.1.1
- RFC 8996
- RFC 7568
- Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: tls_versions TLSv1.2, TLSv1.3
- NIS2 21(2)(h)
- IR 2024/2690 9.2(b): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 9.2(b): Cryptography
- NIST SC-8(1): NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-8(1): Cryptographic Protection
- High
Weak SSL Key Length
SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak
What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key
- CWE-326
- OWASP A04:2025
- Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048
- NIS2 21(2)(h)
- IR 2024/2690 9.2(b): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 9.2(b): Cryptography
- NIST SC-13: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-13: Cryptographic Protection
- High
Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com
Keep watching sentinelone.com
This scan found 11 issues across 4 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
Daily monitoring
Recommended€25per month
- TLS certificates and expiry
- DNS records
- SPF, DKIM and DMARC
- Security headers
- GDPR and NIS2 posture
- Exposed services
- Third-party trackers
- Security score drift
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.
Full report
€39.90one-time
- The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
- Email delivery with an unlock code
- Lifetime access to this report
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Results by check
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
How this score is calculated
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
- SSL/TLS
- 57
- Email security
- 80
- DNS health
- 90
- Network security
- 100
- Average
- 82
- After the cap
- 75
Not counted
- Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
- GDPR outside view: did not complete in this scan.
- NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
- OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
- The certificate is not trusted by browsers
- The website is not served over HTTPS
- A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
- The page loads a script from a compromised source
- The domain registration has expired
- SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
- Critical0–25
- High26–49
- Medium50–75
- Low76–100
Technical appendix
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Business context
Business profile
Security posture
Recommendations
- Publish a dedicated security policy page detailing security controls and practices.
- Provide clear incident response contact channels such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
- Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file.
- Explicitly set and document security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options.
- Enhance transparency by detailing data retention policies and privacy compliance measures.
Contact details published on the site
- Addresses
- Legal name
- SentinelOne
Site observations
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Business
- Company
- SentinelOne
- Description
- SentinelOne unifies AI-powered endpoint, cloud, identity, and data protection—enhanced by our Security Data Lake for seamless and efficient cybersecurity.
- Key services
- Singularity Platform, AI Security Portfolio, Endpoint Security, Cloud Security, Identity Security, Managed Detection and Response (MDR), Threat Intelligence, Vulnerability Management
- Content quality
- excellent
- Branding
- consistent
Technology
- Stack
- jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Marketo Forms, FontFaceObserver, Swiper Carousel, New Relic Browser Agent, Microsoft Clarity, Intellimize, Qualified
- Frameworks
- WordPress (implied by wp-content paths), Yoast SEO
- Platforms
- Web
- Performance
- fast
- Mobile
- excellent
- Accessibility
- good
- SEO
- excellent
Security
- Observed score
- 90/100
- Good practices seen
- HTTPS enforced
- Security policy violation event listener
- No exposed sensitive data in HTML
- Secure forms with reCAPTCHA
- Cookie consent mechanism
Analytics and tracking
- Services
- Google Analytics (via GTM), Microsoft Clarity, New Relic Browser Agent
- Tracking level
- extensive
- Privacy practices
- good
Advertising
- Tracking pixels
- Microsoft Clarity, Intellimize, Qualified, Marketo, Calibermind
- Marketing tools
- Marketo, Calibermind, Qualified, Intellimize
- Transparency
- good
Site quality
- Design
- excellent
- User experience
- excellent
- Content relevance
- excellent
- Navigation
- excellent
- Professionalism
- excellent
- Trustworthiness
- high
Key observations
- Website is professionally designed and well-structured
- Strong branding and consistent messaging
- Comprehensive product and service offerings detailed
- Multiple language support available
- Robust marketing and analytics integration
- No signs of blocking or WAF challenges
- Security best practices mostly followed
- Contact information clearly provided
- Privacy and cookie policies present and GDPR compliant
Technical notes
Notes
Standards and sources
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
- MITRE CWE (opens in a new tab)4.20 (2026-04-30) · CWE Terms of Use (free use with attribution, © MITRE)
- OWASP Top 10:2025 (opens in a new tab)2025 (membership per CWE 4.20) · CC BY-SA 4.0
- MITRE CAPEC (opens in a new tab)3.9 (2023-01-24) · CAPEC Terms of Use (free use with attribution, © MITRE)
- OWASP ASVS (opens in a new tab)5.0.0 · CC BY-SA 4.0
- OWASP Web Security Testing Guide (opens in a new tab)latest (checklist.json, master) · CC BY-SA 4.0
- OWASP Secure Headers Project (opens in a new tab)2026-10-18 · Apache-2.0
- Mozilla Server Side TLS (intermediate) (opens in a new tab)6.0 · MPL-2.0
- NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 (OSCAL catalog) (opens in a new tab)5.2.0 · Public domain (US Government work)
- Directive (EU) 2022/2555 (NIS2) (opens in a new tab)OJ L 333, 27.12.2022 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
- Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 (opens in a new tab)OJ L, 18.10.2024 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
- Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (GDPR) (opens in a new tab)OJ L 119, 4.5.2016 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
- Directive 2002/58/EC (ePrivacy), consolidated (opens in a new tab)19.12.2009 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
- RFC Editor metadata (opens in a new tab)per-RFC (obsolete RFCs rejected) · IETF Trust Legal Provisions (metadata only)
- NIST CSRC, W3C TR, IETF Datatracker, EDPB, EUR-Lex CELLAR and gesetze-bayern.de (opens in a new tab)per document · Titles and links only
- NIST NVD CVE API 2.0 (opens in a new tab)live records · Public domain (NVD); CVE® records © MITRE, free use
- W3C WCAG 2.2 (opens in a new tab)W3C Recommendation (wcag.json) · W3C Software and Document License
- ETSI EN 301 549 (opens in a new tab)V3.2.1 (2021-03), clause headings · Clause numbers and titles only (© ETSI)
- Directive (EU) 2019/882 (European Accessibility Act) (opens in a new tab)OJ L 151, 7.6.2019 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
- Directive (EU) 2016/2102 (Web Accessibility Directive) (opens in a new tab)OJ L 327, 2.12.2016 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
Retrieved 2026-10-25
Feedback on this report
Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with sentinelone.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review sentinelone.com.