Skip to main content

Security report for sentia.dk

Sentia · Technology · Denmark

Low risk. No critical or high findings.

Security score

92/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Sentia is a well-established Danish IT outsourcing company founded in 2002, specializing in managed cloud and application performance services for organizations. The company positions itself as a provider of business-critical IT outsourcing solutions, including managed private and public cloud offerings and technical application management. The website is professionally designed, primarily in Danish, targeting Danish organizations requiring advanced cloud services. The digital infrastructure includes modern technologies such as Cookiebot for consent management and Piwik Pro for analytics, indicating a mature digital presence. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enabled and cookie consent mechanisms in place, although DNSSEC is not enabled and no explicit security policy or incident response contacts are published. Privacy compliance is strong, with a comprehensive privacy policy and GDPR-aligned cookie consent. Overall, the website reflects a credible and professional business with good technical and privacy practices, though improvements can be made in transparency and security disclosures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
5of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

No critical or high findings. These medium findings are worth fixing next.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • Medium

      Missing Permissions-Policy header

      Controls browser features and APIs

      What to do: Implement a Permissions-Policy to restrict feature access

      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Permissions-Policy: accelerometer=(), autoplay=(), camera=(), cross-origin-isolated=(),…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Medium

      Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

      Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

      What to do: Update privacy policy to explicitly address GDPR requirements and user rights

Keep watching sentia.dk

This scan found 6 issues across 4 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
92

Not counted

  • Email security: did not complete in this scan.
  • DNS health: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Sentia operates in the technology sector, focusing on managed cloud services and IT outsourcing. Its market position is that of an established player in Denmark, with a business model centered on providing managed cloud infrastructure and application performance services to enterprise and large organizations. The company leverages partnerships with major platforms and analytics providers such as Google, Facebook, Hubspot, and Piwik Pro, indicating a broad ecosystem integration. Revenue streams likely include managed cloud subscriptions, application management contracts, and consulting services. The target customer segment includes organizations requiring reliable and scalable cloud solutions with strong performance guarantees. The company demonstrates growth indicators through its comprehensive service offerings and digital marketing efforts. No parent or subsidiary companies were identified from the data.

Security posture

Sentia demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and a detailed cookie consent mechanism that aligns with GDPR requirements. The use of Cookiebot and domain verification meta tags for Google and Facebook indicate attention to privacy and security compliance. However, the absence of DNSSEC reduces DNS security, and no explicit security policy or incident response contact information is published, which are areas for improvement. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. The website uses multiple third-party analytics and marketing tools, which increases the attack surface but appears managed through consent mechanisms. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be enhanced by publishing security policies and enabling DNSSEC.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and controls.
  3. Add explicit incident response contact information such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  4. Create and publish a terms of service page to clarify user agreements and liabilities.
  5. Implement a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Sentia
Description
Sentia offers business-critical IT outsourcing including managed private and public cloud solutions and technical application management.
Key services
Managed private cloud, Managed public cloud, Technical application management, Business-critical IT outsourcing
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Cookiebot, Piwik Pro analytics, Cloudflare (inferred from cookies), Typekit fonts
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Cookie consent with granular controls
  • Google site verification
  • Facebook domain verification

Analytics and tracking

Services
Piwik Pro, Google Analytics, Hubspot
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google DoubleClick, Facebook Ads
Tracking pixels
Hubspot, Piwik Pro, Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Hubspot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Comprehensive cookie consent with detailed cookie categories and providers
  2. Strong privacy compliance with GDPR indicators
  3. No visible contact emails or phone numbers on the main page
  4. No terms of service page found
  5. Use of multiple third-party analytics and marketing tools
  6. No DNSSEC enabled for domain
  7. Website content is in Danish targeting Danish organizations
  8. Use of Cookiebot for consent management
  9. Presence of Google and Facebook domain verification meta tags
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses modern web technologies including JavaScript, Cookiebot for cookie consent management, and Piwik Pro for analytics. Fonts are loaded via Adobe Typekit. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and accessibility features. Performance is moderate, with no major issues detected in the HTML structure or SEO metadata. The hosting and registrar information is consistent with the business location in Denmark. The site integrates multiple third-party services for analytics, marketing, and social media, which are managed through consent banners. Technical risks include the lack of DNSSEC and absence of explicit security headers in the provided data. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and compliant web presence but can be improved by enhancing DNS and security policy disclosures.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with sentia.dk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review sentia.dk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.