Skip to main content

Security report for sensorium.is

SENSORIUM · Other · N/a

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SENSORIUM operates a WordPress-based website focused on promoting cultural festivals, specifically the Sensorium Festival editions from 2021 through 2024. The site targets a general audience interested in cultural events and provides event dates and links to detailed festival pages. The business appears to be a small-scale cultural event promoter founded in 2016, with consistent branding and a professional web presence. Technically, the site uses WordPress with common plugins such as Yoast SEO and WP Dark Mode, hosted by websupport.sk, and includes Google Analytics for visitor tracking. The website is moderately optimized for performance and mobile use, with good SEO practices and basic accessibility features. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and no exposed sensitive data, but lacks advanced security headers and explicit privacy or cookie policies. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is present. Overall, the domain registration data aligns well with the website content and business age, indicating legitimacy. The site is safe for general audiences with no adult or explicit content detected.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching sensorium.is

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention sensorium.is, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for sensorium.is right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website positions SENSORIUM as a niche cultural festival organizer, focusing on the Sensorium Festival series. The business model centers on event promotion and cultural engagement, targeting festival attendees and cultural enthusiasts. The company leverages a WordPress platform for content management and SEO optimization to reach its audience. Partnerships appear limited but include hosting and development by known entities. Revenue streams are likely event-related, though not explicitly detailed. Growth indicators include multiple festival editions and consistent event scheduling. The partnership ecosystem includes web hosting and development providers. Strategic observations suggest a focused cultural niche with potential for expansion through enhanced digital marketing and clearer business information.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is properly implemented, ensuring encrypted communications. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No sensitive data exposure or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. The site lacks explicit privacy and cookie policies, which are critical for GDPR compliance and user trust. Incident response readiness and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are not evident, indicating potential gaps in security culture and compliance. Overall, the security posture is functional but could be significantly improved by implementing recommended headers, policies, and response procedures.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security.
  2. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with visible consent mechanisms to comply with GDPR and improve user trust.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen security posture.
  4. Establish and publish incident response and vulnerability disclosure information to demonstrate security maturity and transparency.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SENSORIUM
Description
SENSORIUM is a platform presenting festivals and cultural events, specifically focused on the Sensorium Festival and its editions from 2021 to 2024. The website showcases festival dates and links to detailed pages about each event.
Key services
Festival event information, Event promotion
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 5.9.12, jQuery 3.6.0, Yoast SEO plugin, Google Analytics, WP Dark Mode plugin
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google Analytics asynchronously

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based event/festival site with good SEO and structured data.
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly provided on the page analyzed.
  4. Use of Google Analytics and Tag Manager indicates tracking but no visible cookie consent mechanism.
  5. No security headers detected in the HTML content provided.
  6. Domain WHOIS data shows no DNSSEC and uses websupport.sk name servers.
  7. No signs of WAF or blocking mechanisms.
  8. Content is safe and suitable for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 5.9.12, utilizing jQuery 3.6.0 and popular plugins like Yoast SEO and WP Dark Mode. It is hosted by websupport.sk, a known hosting provider. The site includes Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for analytics and tracking. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of analytics scripts. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and basic accessibility features. SEO is enhanced through meta tags, Open Graph tags, and JSON-LD structured data. Technical risks include lack of DNSSEC, missing security headers, and absence of privacy and cookie compliance mechanisms. Opportunities exist to modernize security practices and improve compliance to reduce risk and enhance user trust.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with sensorium.is. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review sensorium.is.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.