Skip to main content

Security report for sensis.de

sensis GmbH · Other · Germany

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

sensis GmbH is a specialized software company focused on developing tailored system solutions for the waste management industry in Germany. Their offerings cover municipal waste management, recycling and recovery plants, commercial waste processes, and innovative digital recycling yard solutions. The company targets municipal enterprises, commercial waste handlers, and recycling facilities, positioning itself as a niche provider with strong industry expertise. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with clear contact channels and customer references. Technically, the site is built on a modern React and Next.js stack, providing good mobile optimization and user experience. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced and secure forms, but lacks some advanced security headers and explicit incident response policies. Privacy compliance is good with a comprehensive privacy policy, though cookie consent mechanisms are missing. Overall, the site scores well on business credibility and content quality, with minor improvements recommended in security and privacy transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching sensis.de

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
28
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in a niche market providing software solutions tailored to the waste management sector, including municipal and commercial waste processes and recycling operations. Their business model is based on software development and sales, targeting municipal enterprises, recycling plants, and commercial waste service providers. The presence of multiple partner and customer logos indicates a solid partnership ecosystem and market presence in Germany. The company leverages digital innovation such as the digital recycling yard platform to differentiate itself. Growth indicators include active blog content, events, and recruitment efforts. The company maintains a professional online presence with executive LinkedIn profiles and customer testimonials, supporting credibility and trust.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and secure contact forms that include user consent for data processing. However, it lacks several recommended security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options, which could enhance protection against common web attacks. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is published, which limits transparency and readiness perception. No analytics or tracking scripts were detected, reducing privacy risks. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could be improved by implementing additional headers, publishing security policies, and introducing cookie consent mechanisms to align with GDPR and best practices.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance web security.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner and explicit cookie policy to improve GDPR compliance and user transparency.
  3. Publish an incident response policy and provide dedicated security contact channels to improve trust and readiness.
  4. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting and transparency.
  5. Regularly review and update privacy and security policies to maintain compliance with evolving regulations and industry standards.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
sensis GmbH
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
sensis GmbH
Description
Entwicklung anwenderfreundlicher Systemlösungen für kommunale und gewerbliche Abfallwirtschaft, maßgeschneidert, skalierbar, vielseitig und modular anwendbar. Zielgruppen sind Stadtbetriebe, Entsorger, Deponien, Abfallerzeuger, Recycling- und Verbrennungsanlagen sowie Containerdienste.
Key services
Kommunale Abfallwirtschaftssoftware, Recycling- und Verwertungsanlagen Software, Gewerbliche Entsorgungsprozesse Software, Digitale Wertstoffhof-Lösungen
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Next.js, JavaScript, CSS
Frameworks
React, Next.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Secure contact forms with consent checkbox

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is focused on software solutions for waste management industry.
  3. Contact information is clearly provided including phone, email, and physical address.
  4. No cookie consent banner or explicit cookie policy detected.
  5. No terms of service page found.
  6. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  7. Modern React/Next.js technology stack used.
  8. Good mobile optimization and user experience.
  9. No analytics or tracking scripts detected in provided HTML.
  10. Multiple partner customer logos linked to external domains.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern web technologies including React and Next.js, enabling server-side rendering and good performance. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and clear navigation. No CMS was detected, indicating a custom or framework-based implementation. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts and styles. Accessibility is basic but could be improved with enhanced ARIA attributes and keyboard navigation support. SEO is well addressed with proper meta tags and structured navigation. No third-party analytics or tracking scripts were found, which benefits privacy but may limit marketing insights. Hosting provider details are not explicitly available from the content. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid with opportunities for further optimization and security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with sensis.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review sensis.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.