Skip to main content

Security report for sensiblepcsolutions.co.uk

Sensible PC · Technology · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Sensible PC Solutions is a small IT support service provider based in England, offering computer support primarily for workplaces and businesses. The website is built on the Wix platform and uses standard Wix technologies along with Facebook Pixel for tracking. The site content is basic but relevant to its business focus, targeting local businesses needing IT solutions. Technically, the site is moderately optimized with good mobile responsiveness but lacks advanced SEO and accessibility features. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled but lacks important security headers and privacy compliance mechanisms. The absence of WHOIS data due to a domain naming rules violation error from Nominet UK raises concerns about domain legitimacy and reduces overall trust. No privacy or cookie policies, contact information, or security incident response details are provided, which further impacts compliance and credibility. Overall, the site is functional but requires improvements in security, privacy, and business transparency to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching sensiblepcsolutions.co.uk

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
69
Security headers
40
Email security
60
DNS health
50
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the technology sector, focusing on IT support services for businesses in England. Its business model revolves around providing practical IT solutions and support to workplaces. The website positions the company as a local/regional service provider with a straightforward service offering. There is no evidence of partnerships, subsidiaries, or parent companies. The site lacks detailed business information such as founding year or certifications, limiting insights into growth or market positioning. The use of Wix suggests a small to medium-sized business with limited digital infrastructure investment. Marketing efforts include Facebook Pixel tracking, indicating some level of user behavior analysis. The absence of privacy and security policies may affect customer trust and regulatory compliance.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communication, which is a fundamental security requirement. However, it lacks critical security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options, which help mitigate common web vulnerabilities. No evidence of vulnerability disclosures, incident response contacts, or security certifications is present. The WHOIS data unavailability due to a domain naming rules violation is a significant red flag, potentially indicating registration issues or misconfiguration. The site uses third-party scripts like Facebook Pixel, which require careful management to avoid privacy risks. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved by implementing best practices and transparency measures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with user consent mechanisms to comply with GDPR and enhance user trust.
  2. Add essential security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options) to strengthen protection against common attacks.
  3. Provide clear and accessible contact information including emails and phone numbers to improve business credibility and customer support.
  4. Investigate and resolve domain WHOIS issues with Nominet UK to ensure domain legitimacy and improve trustworthiness.
  5. Enhance website accessibility and SEO features to improve user experience and search engine visibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Sensible PC
Description
Sensible PC Solutions computer support, at work or in the workplace. If its IT related we will have the solution.
Key services
Computer support, IT related solutions
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
Wix.com Website Builder, JavaScript, Facebook Pixel
Platforms
Wix
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Services
Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is built on Wix platform with standard Wix scripts and Facebook Pixel tracking.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  3. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses explicitly found in the content.
  4. No security policies or incident response information provided.
  5. WHOIS data is unavailable due to domain naming rules violation error, impacting trust.
  6. Site content is basic and focused on IT support services in England.
  7. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  8. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Wix platform, leveraging Wix's hosting and content management system. It uses standard web technologies including HTML5, CSS, and JavaScript. Facebook Pixel is integrated for analytics and marketing purposes. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features but lacks advanced SEO optimizations such as structured data beyond a simple WebSite schema and comprehensive meta tags. Performance is moderate, typical for Wix-hosted sites. There is no evidence of custom backend technologies or frameworks beyond Wix's ecosystem. The absence of security headers and privacy compliance features indicates technical debt in security and regulatory adherence.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with sensiblepcsolutions.co.uk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review sensiblepcsolutions.co.uk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.