Skip to main content

Security report for sendsmaily.net

Smaily · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

56/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Smaily is a technology company providing a SaaS platform focused on email marketing and newsletter creation. The website offers a simple, user-friendly interface with social login options and an award-winning drag and drop editor, targeting businesses and marketers seeking efficient email marketing solutions. The platform emphasizes ease of use and integration capabilities with over 1000 services. Technically, the website uses modern web technologies including HTTPS, Google Fonts, and Google Tag Manager for analytics. The site is mobile optimized and presents a professional design with clear navigation. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enforced and social authentication, but lacks visible security headers and published security policies. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain is a significant concern, suggesting possible domain registration issues that impact trustworthiness. Privacy compliance is partial with a Terms of Service link but no visible cookie consent or privacy policy on the login page. Overall, the site is functional and professional but requires improvements in transparency, security policies, and domain legitimacy verification.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching sendsmaily.net

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
35
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
35
Average
56

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Smaily operates in the competitive email marketing SaaS sector, positioning itself as a simple yet powerful tool for newsletter creation. Its key competitive advantages include an intuitive drag and drop editor and extensive integration options. The business model relies on user registrations and likely subscription plans, although pricing details are not visible on the login page. The target customers are small to medium businesses and marketers seeking to improve email marketing efficiency. The presence of multiple social login options indicates a focus on user convenience and broad accessibility. However, the lack of publicly available company registration or contact information limits transparency. The domain registration inconsistency may pose risks to customer trust and business continuity. Strategic partnerships or subsidiaries are not evident from the data provided.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses social authentication providers, which are positive security practices. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security reduces the overall security posture. No security policy, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are published, which limits transparency and readiness for security incidents. The lack of cookie consent mechanisms raises GDPR compliance concerns. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. The missing WHOIS data for the domain is a critical trust and legitimacy issue that should be addressed promptly. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but requires enhancements in policy publication, header implementation, and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Verify and correct domain registration to ensure WHOIS data is publicly available and accurate.
  2. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to improve GDPR compliance.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection.
  4. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  5. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Smaily
Description
Smaily is an intentionally simple tool for sending beautiful email newsletters to help increase business marketing quality and efficiency, while reducing preparation time and resources. It offers an award-winning drag and drop editor and over 1000 integrations.
Key services
Email newsletter creation and sending, Drag and drop email editor, Integration with over 1000 services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Fonts, JavaScript, CSS, Google Tag Manager
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of social authentication providers

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no WAF or blocking detected
  2. No WHOIS data available, indicating possible domain registration issues
  3. Website uses HTTPS and social login providers for authentication
  4. No privacy or cookie policy explicitly found on the login page, but Terms of Service is linked
  5. No contact information or security policy found on the analyzed page
  6. Website content is professional and focused on email marketing services
  7. No adult or questionable content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack including Google Fonts, JavaScript, CSS, and Google Tag Manager for analytics. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and clear navigation. Performance is moderate based on the content and resources loaded. No CMS or hosting provider information was detected from the HTML content. The site uses social login providers (Google, Facebook, LinkedIn, Microsoft) for authentication, indicating integration with OAuth or similar protocols. There is no evidence of outdated or vulnerable libraries in the provided scripts. SEO optimization is basic with meta viewport and charset tags but no Open Graph or JSON-LD structured data found. Accessibility features are basic with no ARIA roles or landmarks detected in the snippet. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could benefit from enhanced SEO and accessibility improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 62/100Medium26 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with sendsmaily.net. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review sendsmaily.net.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.