Skip to main content

Security report for senator-press.com

Senator Press · Other · N/a

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Senator Press operates a website hosted on the Wix platform, presenting itself as a business entity likely involved in publishing or press services. The site lacks detailed business descriptions, contact information, and legal policies, which limits the ability to fully assess its market position or business model. Technically, the site uses standard Wix technologies and polyfills, with moderate performance and basic mobile optimization. Security posture is weak due to the absence of security headers and no visible HTTPS verification in the provided data. The WHOIS data is unavailable or the domain is unregistered, which raises concerns about the legitimacy and trustworthiness of the domain. Overall, the site appears functional but lacks critical compliance and security features.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      SSL Certificate Expires Soon

      SSL certificate expires in 25 days

      What to do: Renew SSL certificate before expiration

      • NIS2 21(2)(h)
      • IR 2024/2690 9.2(c): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 9.2(c): Cryptography
      • NIST SC-17: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-17: Public Key Infrastructure Certificates

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • High

      No DMARC record found

      DMARC provides email authentication and reporting

      What to do: Add DMARC record: "v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@yourdomain.com"

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching senator-press.com

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
59
Security headers
40
Email security
80
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website does not provide explicit business intelligence data such as company size, founding year, or market positioning. The lack of contact details and legal policies suggests a small or early-stage business or a placeholder site. The use of Wix indicates a low-cost, easy-to-manage web presence. No partnerships or subsidiaries are identified. The absence of trust indicators and certifications limits confidence in the business credibility.

Security posture

The security posture is minimal. No security headers were detected, and the WHOIS data is missing, which is a red flag. The site uses HTTPS as implied by the URL but no detailed SSL configuration data is available. The presence of Sentry indicates some level of error monitoring. No incident response or security policy information is provided. The site lacks privacy and cookie policies, which is a compliance gap. Overall, the site is vulnerable to trust and security concerns.

Recommendations

  1. Register the domain properly and ensure WHOIS data is accurate and publicly available.
  2. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and other regulations.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Publish clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for business credibility.
  5. Conduct a security audit to identify and remediate vulnerabilities and improve SSL/TLS configuration.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Senator Press
Description
No explicit business description found in the content. The website appears to be a business site named Senator Press.
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
Wix, JavaScript, Segmenter Polyfill, Core-js, Focus-within-polyfill, Performance API Polyfills
Platforms
Wix.com Website Builder
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Analytics and tracking

Services
Sentry
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Sentry
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is built on Wix platform with standard Wix scripts and polyfills.
  2. No WHOIS registration data available, indicating possible unregistered domain or WHOIS privacy.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  4. No contact information such as emails, phone numbers, or addresses found.
  5. No security policies or incident response information present.
  6. No business certifications or trust indicators visible.
  7. Website content is minimal and lacks detailed business description.
  8. No forms detected in the HTML content.
  9. External domains are mostly Wix and CDN related.
  10. Sentry is used for error monitoring but no other analytics or marketing tools detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Wix platform using standard Wix scripts and polyfills for browser compatibility. It uses Sentry for error monitoring. The site is moderately optimized for mobile devices and has basic SEO meta tags. However, no advanced frameworks or custom technologies are detected. Performance is moderate, likely due to Wix hosting and standard scripts. Accessibility features are basic, with some ARIA and focus management scripts. The site lacks advanced SEO and security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with senator-press.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review senator-press.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.