Skip to main content

Security report for seminpc.dk

Technology · Denmark

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 3 other checks.

Security score

41/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website seminpc.dk offers remote support services primarily through the ISL Online remote support platform. It targets end users who require assistance with their computers, providing downloadable client software for macOS, macOS Sonoma, and Windows. The business appears to be a small technology service provider based in Denmark, with a domain age consistent with a decade-long operation. The site is professionally designed with clear navigation and good mobile optimization, though it lacks explicit privacy and cookie policies, which impacts compliance and trust. Technically, the site uses a modern frontend stack including Bootstrap 5.3.2 and jQuery 1.12.4, with external resources loaded from reputable CDNs. The performance is moderate, and accessibility features are basic. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS in use, but the absence of DNSSEC and security headers reduces the overall security score. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. Security-wise, the site does not provide explicit security policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure information, which are important for trust and compliance. The WHOIS data shows a consistent and legitimate domain registration without privacy protection, supporting the site's credibility. However, the lack of privacy and cookie policies and security best practices suggests room for improvement. Overall, seminpc.dk is a functional and moderately secure remote support service website with good business credibility but needs to enhance privacy compliance and security practices to improve trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching seminpc.dk

This scan found 29 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
45
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
41

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Seminpc.dk operates in the technology sector, focusing on remote support services using ISL Online software. The business model revolves around providing remote access support sessions via session codes, targeting individual users or small businesses needing technical assistance. The company leverages partnerships with known Danish hosting and domain providers such as Curanet, ScanNet, DanDomain, Wannafind, and Simply, indicating a collaborative ecosystem within the Danish IT services market. The website content and domain age suggest a stable presence since 2010, but the absence of detailed business contact information and policies limits transparency. Revenue streams likely derive from support service fees or subscriptions tied to the ISL Online platform. Growth potential exists through enhanced digital presence and compliance improvements.

Security posture

The security posture of seminpc.dk is moderate. The site uses HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communication, but lacks DNSSEC, which could protect against DNS spoofing. No security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options were detected, which are recommended to mitigate common web attacks. The use of an older jQuery version (1.12.4) may expose the site to known vulnerabilities unless properly patched. There is no visible privacy policy, cookie consent mechanism, or vulnerability disclosure program, which are critical for GDPR compliance and user trust. Incident response contacts and security policies are absent, indicating limited preparedness for security incidents. Overall, while no critical vulnerabilities are evident, the site should adopt stronger security controls and compliance measures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Enable DNSSEC for the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing attacks.
  3. Add standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to harden the website against common threats.
  4. Update jQuery to the latest secure version or ensure current version is patched to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
  5. Establish and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy and incident response contact information to improve security transparency and readiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Med fjernsupport kan vores supportere tilgå din computer og hurtigt løse problemerne for dig.
Key services
Remote computer support via session codes, Downloadable support client for macOS, macOS Sonoma, and Windows
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.12.4, Bootstrap 5.3.2, ISL Online remote support scripts
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by URL https://seminpc.dk/)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website provides remote support service using ISL Online software.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  3. No explicit contact information such as emails or phone numbers found.
  4. Site uses modern frontend technologies but older jQuery version.
  5. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information present.
  6. No social media or external contact channels detected.
  7. WHOIS data shows domain is active, not privacy protected, and expires soon (in 36 days).
  8. DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a security improvement opportunity.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern frontend technology stack including Bootstrap 5.3.2 and jQuery 1.12.4, with resources loaded from reputable CDNs such as jsdelivr and Google Fonts. The site is mobile responsive and has good navigation clarity. However, the jQuery version is outdated, which may pose security risks. No CMS or backend technologies were detected from the provided data. Performance is moderate, with no explicit performance optimization indicators. Accessibility features are basic but present. The site lacks advanced SEO optimizations such as structured data or Open Graph metadata. Hosting provider details are not evident from the data. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with seminpc.dk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review seminpc.dk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.