Skip to main content

Security report for segarracatedra.es

Other · Spain

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Email security, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website 'CEU Cátedra Segarra' appears to be an educational or institutional site based in Spain, built on the WordPress platform using the Betheme theme. It targets a Spanish-speaking audience and provides content likely related to academic or research activities. The technical infrastructure includes standard web technologies such as jQuery and Google Tag Manager for analytics, along with Cookiebot for cookie consent management. The site is accessible without any WAF or security challenge blocking access. However, the absence of publicly available WHOIS data due to registry restrictions limits the ability to fully verify domain ownership and legitimacy. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled but lacking advanced security headers and no visible security or incident response policies. Privacy compliance is partial, with cookie consent implemented but no explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found. Overall, the site is professionally designed and mobile optimized but would benefit from enhanced transparency and security practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
100/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching segarracatedra.es

This scan found 18 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
100
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention segarracatedra.es, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for segarracatedra.es right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business behind the website is not explicitly identified due to lack of registrant data and absence of detailed company information on the site. The site likely serves an academic or research institution audience, possibly affiliated with CEU (a known educational entity in Spain). The business model appears to be informational or educational rather than commercial. There are no visible revenue streams, affiliate programs, or advertising networks beyond basic analytics and cookie consent tools. The site maintains a consistent brand presence with good design quality but lacks explicit trust signals such as certifications or testimonials. The partnership ecosystem is not evident from the site content or linked domains.

Security posture

Security maturity is moderate. The site uses HTTPS, which is mandatory for secure communications, and implements cookie consent via Cookiebot, indicating some attention to privacy regulations. However, no advanced security headers (e.g., Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options) were detected, and there is no published security policy or incident response contact information. The absence of a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure mechanism reduces transparency and readiness for security incidents. No known vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were identified in the content. The site would benefit from implementing additional security best practices and publishing clear policies to improve trust and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages to improve privacy compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement and configure security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance security posture.
  3. Provide clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for general and security incident reporting.
  4. Add a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and improve incident response readiness.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to avoid potential vulnerabilities and ensure compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot
Frameworks
Betheme
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Cookie consent implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security mechanisms
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable due to registry restrictions
  3. Website uses WordPress CMS with Betheme and jQuery
  4. Cookie consent is implemented via Cookiebot
  5. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages detected
  6. No contact emails or phone numbers found in visible content
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found
  8. HTTPS is enabled but security headers are not detected
  9. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and tracking
  10. Content is primarily in Spanish and appears educational
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with the Betheme theme, leveraging jQuery and Google Tag Manager for analytics. Cookiebot is used for cookie consent management, indicating GDPR awareness. The site loads multiple CSS and JS resources from its own domain and trusted external sources like Google Fonts and Cookiebot CDN. Performance is moderate with no explicit indicators of slow loading but could be improved with optimization. Mobile optimization is good, with responsive design and viewport meta tags. Accessibility features are basic, with no explicit ARIA roles or landmarks detected. SEO optimization is basic, with standard meta tags but no Open Graph or JSON-LD structured data found in the truncated content. Hosting provider and server details are not disclosed. Overall, the technical stack is standard for a small to medium educational website but could benefit from modernization and enhanced SEO and accessibility features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with segarracatedra.es. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review segarracatedra.es.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.