Skip to main content

Security report for seersco.com

Seers · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Seers is a specialized privacy and consent management platform that assists businesses in achieving compliance with major data protection regulations such as GDPR, CCPA, PECR, and LGPD. The company positions itself as a leading provider in the data privacy management space, serving over 50,000 companies and managing over 1.2 billion consents. Their offerings include cookie consent management, GDPR audits, policy generation, and staff training. The website reflects a mature SaaS business model with a professional digital presence built on WordPress and Elementor, supported by modern analytics and marketing tools. The technical infrastructure leverages Cloudflare DNS and AWS hosting, ensuring reliable performance and security. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforcement and domain locking, though improvements such as enabling DNSSEC and publishing explicit privacy and cookie policies are recommended. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and well-positioned in the privacy compliance market, but could enhance transparency and compliance documentation to further build user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
100/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching seersco.com

This scan found 22 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
15
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
100
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Seers operates in the technology sector, focusing on privacy compliance solutions for businesses globally. Their competitive advantage lies in comprehensive compliance tools combined with training and certification services. The business model is subscription-based SaaS with additional services like audits and policy generation. The target customers are businesses needing to comply with complex privacy laws. The company demonstrates growth through partnerships (e.g., Calendly for demos) and industry recognition via multiple awards. The website content and structure support lead generation and customer onboarding. No parent or subsidiary companies were identified, indicating an independent operation. The company’s digital marketing and analytics setup suggests a data-driven approach to customer engagement and retention.

Security posture

The security maturity level is moderate to good. The website uses HTTPS with a valid SSL configuration and registrar locks to protect domain integrity. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a recommended best practice for DNS security. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are present, which could hinder responsible vulnerability reporting. The absence of explicit privacy and cookie policies on the main site reduces compliance transparency. Analytics and tracking scripts are present but managed via consent management platform, indicating some level of user privacy consideration. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could be improved with enhanced DNS security and clearer compliance documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to strengthen DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish comprehensive and easily accessible privacy and cookie policies linked from the homepage.
  3. Implement a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure and incident reporting.
  4. Review and enhance security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP) and X-Content-Type-Options if not already implemented.
  5. Increase transparency around data retention policies and user consent management to improve privacy compliance and user trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Seers
Description
Seers is a privacy and consent management platform helping companies comply with GDPR, PECR, LGPD, CCPA, Google Consent Mode and ePrivacy. They offer comprehensive privacy, compliance, data protection, audits, and policy generators.
Key services
Cookie Consent Management, GDPR Audit, Policy Generator, GDPR Staff e Training
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Cloudflare DNS, MonsterInsights, Yoast SEO, jQuery
Frameworks
WordPress, Elementor
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Domain locked with multiple EPP status codes
  • Use of Cloudflare DNS for resilience

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, MonsterInsights
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity
Marketing tools
MonsterInsights, HubSpot
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional privacy and consent management platform focused on GDPR and CCPA compliance.
  2. No explicit privacy policy, cookie policy, or terms of service pages detected in main HTML content.
  3. Multiple forms present for domain scanning but no direct contact forms or emails found.
  4. Strong use of modern web technologies and SEO plugins (Yoast SEO).
  5. Use of Google Analytics and Microsoft Clarity for user behavior tracking.
  6. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information.
  7. Domain is well-registered and secured with registrar locks but DNSSEC is not enabled.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with Elementor page builder, leveraging modern web technologies including jQuery, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and Microsoft Clarity for analytics and user behavior tracking. Hosting appears to be on AWS with Cloudflare DNS providing resilience and performance benefits. The site uses Yoast SEO plugin for search engine optimization and MonsterInsights for analytics integration. Performance is moderate with lazy loading scripts and fonts optimized. Mobile responsiveness is good, and accessibility features are basic but present. The technical stack is mature and well-maintained, though enabling DNSSEC and additional security headers would further enhance the technical security posture.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with seersco.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review seersco.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.