Skip to main content

Security report for seeme.agency

SEE ME Agency · Other · Switzerland

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SEE ME Agency is a Swiss-based marketing and web design agency specializing in creating compelling websites and digital strategies to help businesses succeed. The website is professionally designed using WordPress with modern plugins such as Elementor and Yoast SEO, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. The site is well-optimized for SEO and mobile devices, providing a good user experience. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and a cookie consent mechanism in place, though there is room for improvement in security headers and explicit privacy and security policies. Overall, the site appears legitimate and trustworthy, targeting businesses in Switzerland seeking marketing services.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching seeme.agency

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
30
Email security
55
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
65
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The agency operates in the marketing and web design sector, focusing on digital strategy and website creation for Swiss businesses. The business model is service-oriented, likely generating revenue through client projects. The website content is consistent and professional, though it lacks explicit contact details and formal privacy or terms of service pages, which could be improved to enhance credibility. No partnerships or subsidiaries are evident from the data. The company appears to be a small-sized entity with a focused market niche.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS and implements a cookie consent banner compliant with GDPR principles, indicating awareness of privacy regulations. However, no security.txt, incident response contacts, or security policy pages are found, which limits transparency in security practices. The absence of security headers reduces the overall security posture. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. The security score is moderate, with recommendations to add security headers, publish security policies, and provide incident response contacts to strengthen the security culture.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency.
  4. Ensure all forms have proper security controls including anti-CSRF tokens and input validation.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party plugins and themes to mitigate vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SEE ME Agency
Description
Deine Marketing- & Webdesign-Agentur in der Schweiz. Wir erstellen überzeugende Websites und digitale Strategien, die dein Unternehmen erfolgreich machen.
Key services
Marketing, Webdesign, Digital Strategies, Website Creation
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO, Elementor, jQuery, Bootstrap, Locomotive Scroll, Swiper, Plyr, FontAwesome, Cookie Law Info plugin
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Yoast SEO, Cookie Law Info
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge
  2. Content is in German targeting Swiss market
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found in provided content
  4. Cookie consent banner is implemented with detailed categories
  5. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the provided HTML snippet
  6. Website uses modern WordPress plugins and themes
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found
  8. No incident response or security contact information found
  9. No certifications or trust badges visible in the content
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using Elementor for page building and Yoast SEO for search engine optimization. It uses modern frontend libraries including Bootstrap for layout, jQuery for scripting, and various plugins for enhanced user experience such as Locomotive Scroll and Swiper. The site loads external fonts from Google Fonts and includes video player integrations from YouTube and Vimeo. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization. Accessibility is basic but could be improved with more ARIA attributes and semantic HTML. The technical stack is modern and well-maintained but would benefit from enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with seeme.agency. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review seeme.agency.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.