Skip to main content

Security report for securex.be

Securex · Other · Belgium

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

79/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Securex is a large international company specializing in social administration and HR services targeting individuals, startups, self-employed professionals, SMEs, large enterprises, and government entities primarily in Belgium. The company offers a comprehensive suite of services including advisory, tools, training, and client portals, positioning itself as a key player in the HR sector. The website reflects a mature digital presence with multi-language support, professional branding, and extensive content tailored to diverse customer segments. Technically, the site leverages modern frameworks such as React and Kentico CMS, integrates advanced analytics and monitoring tools like Microsoft Application Insights and Google Tag Manager, and employs security measures including HTTPS and Google reCAPTCHA. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear policies and cookie consent mechanisms. However, WHOIS data is restricted, which is typical for corporate domains but limits transparency. Overall, the site demonstrates strong business credibility, technical maturity, and a solid security posture with room for improvement in explicit security headers and incident response disclosures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
100/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching securex.be

This scan found 19 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
45
Email security
80
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
100
Average
79

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Securex operates in the HR and social administration sector with a B2B and B2C business model. Its market positioning as an international player is supported by a broad target audience including individuals, startups, SMEs, and government organizations. The company emphasizes partnerships, training, and digital tools to enhance client engagement. The website's content and navigation are designed to support lead generation and customer support through contact forms and newsletters. The presence on multiple social media platforms and integration with marketing and analytics tools indicate a sophisticated marketing strategy. The lack of visible direct contact emails suggests a controlled communication approach, likely to reduce spam and improve customer service efficiency.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses Google reCAPTCHA v3 to protect forms from abuse. Cookie consent is managed via Cookiebot, ensuring compliance with privacy regulations. Microsoft Application Insights is used for monitoring, indicating proactive performance and error tracking. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No vulnerability disclosures or security.txt files were found, which could enhance transparency and trust. Overall, the security posture is good but could be strengthened by adopting additional HTTP security headers and publishing incident response information.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate risks from external libraries.
  5. Enhance visibility of data protection officer contact details to support GDPR compliance and user trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Securex
Description
Securex is een internationale speler op het vlak van sociale administratie en HR voor particulieren, starters, zelfstandigen, kmo’s, grote ondernemingen en overheden.
Key services
sociale administratie, HR services, advies, tools, opleidingen, klantenportalen
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Kentico CMS, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Application Insights, Google reCAPTCHA v3, Cookiebot, Swiper.js, jQuery
Frameworks
React
Platforms
Kentico CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA v3 on forms
  • Cookie consent management
  • Application Insights monitoring

Analytics and tracking

Services
Microsoft Clarity, Google Analytics (via GTM), Microsoft Application Insights
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Microsoft Advertising (Bing Ads)
Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity, Google Analytics via GTM, Bing UET
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design.
  2. Strong focus on HR and social administration services for various customer segments.
  3. Multiple language options and localized content.
  4. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent management.
  5. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  6. No visible security or privacy red flags in content or scripts.
  7. WHOIS data is restricted, but this is common for corporate domains in .be TLD.
  8. Contact information includes phone number and contact forms but no direct emails publicly listed.
  9. Social media presence on major platforms is active and linked.
  10. No explicit security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern technology stack featuring React for frontend interactivity and Kentico CMS for content management. It integrates multiple third-party services including Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Application Insights, and Cookiebot for analytics, monitoring, and privacy compliance. Performance is moderate with optimizations such as font preloading and lazy loading of images. Accessibility and SEO are well addressed with proper meta tags, language alternates, and structured data (JSON-LD). The site is mobile optimized and provides a clear navigation structure. Technical risks include reliance on multiple external scripts which require ongoing security monitoring and the lack of some security headers. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified from the content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with securex.be. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review securex.be.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.