Skip to main content

Security report for securehost.de

Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website securehost.de/login/ serves as a login portal for users likely accessing hosting or domain management services. The site is minimalistic, providing only essential login functionality with username and password fields and a password reset link. The business appears to target existing customers or users of securehost.de services, focusing on secure authentication. The market position and company details are not disclosed on this page, limiting business insight. Technically, the site uses older versions of Bootstrap and jQuery, with external resources loaded from vmcdn.de CDN. The site lacks modern SEO and accessibility features and shows only basic mobile optimization. Security-wise, the site uses POST for login forms and masks password input but lacks visible security headers and advanced protections. WHOIS data is limited due to DENIC policy, with no registrar or creation/expiry dates disclosed, which reduces trust but is typical for .de domains. No WAF or blocking mechanisms were detected, and the content is safe with no adult or explicit material. Overall, the site scores moderately on AI evaluation, with recommendations to improve security headers, privacy policies, and technical modernization.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
15/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching securehost.de

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
80
Email security
70
DNS health
45
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
15
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention securehost.de, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
146
Employees
0
Customers
146
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
5%

11 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for securehost.de.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Securehost.de appears to operate in the technology sector, likely providing hosting or domain-related services. The business model involves user account management and secure login access. The lack of public business information and contact details on this page limits visibility into market positioning and revenue streams. The site targets existing customers needing access to their accounts. The use of a CDN for static resources suggests some level of infrastructure investment. No partnerships or subsidiaries are identified from the content. Growth indicators and strategic positioning cannot be assessed from this limited login page.

Security posture

The security posture is basic. The login form uses POST and password masking, which are standard practices. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection is a concern. No visible HTTPS enforcement or SSL details are present in the HTML content, though likely enforced at the server level. No incident response or security policy information is provided. The WHOIS data is minimal due to DENIC restrictions, which is common for .de domains but reduces transparency. No vulnerabilities or malware indicators were detected in the content. Overall, the site would benefit from enhanced security headers, multi-factor authentication, and visible privacy and security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify HTTPS with strong SSL/TLS configuration and ensure it is enforced site-wide.
  2. Add essential security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to mitigate common web attacks.
  3. Publish clear privacy and cookie policies to improve compliance and user trust.
  4. Introduce multi-factor authentication to strengthen login security.
  5. Modernize the technology stack by upgrading Bootstrap and jQuery to supported versions and improve mobile and accessibility features.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Website provides a login portal for users to access services related to securehost.de, likely hosting or domain management services.
Key services
User login authentication, Password reset functionality
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap 3.3.7, jQuery 3.3.1
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
50/100
Good practices seen
  • Secure form with POST method
  • Password input field masked

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a simple login page with minimal content.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on this page.
  3. No contact information or social media links present.
  4. External resources loaded from vmcdn.de CDN domain.
  5. No visible security headers or advanced security features in HTML content.
  6. WHOIS data is limited due to DENIC policy; no registrar or registrant info available.
  7. No WAF or blocking detected; site content accessible.
  8. No adult or explicit content detected; content is safe.
  9. Site uses older Bootstrap 3.3.7 and jQuery 3.3.1 versions.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses Bootstrap 3.3.7 and jQuery 3.3.1 loaded from an external CDN (vmcdn.de). The HTML structure is basic and functional but lacks modern SEO meta tags and accessibility attributes. The login form uses POST method and standard input types. No CMS or advanced frameworks are detected. Performance is likely moderate given the use of CDN resources but could be improved with modern front-end technologies. Mobile optimization is basic, and no ARIA or accessibility features are evident. The site does not expose any sensitive data in the HTML. The WHOIS data is limited due to DENIC policy, with no registrar or creation/expiry dates available, which complicates domain age and legitimacy assessment.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with securehost.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review securehost.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.