Skip to main content

Security report for section508.gov

General Services Administration · Government · United States

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

76/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Section508.gov is an official U.S. government website managed by the General Services Administration (GSA) that provides authoritative resources, guidance, and tools to ensure compliance with Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act. The site targets federal agencies, vendors, and stakeholders involved in creating accessible information and communication technology (ICT) for individuals with disabilities. It holds a strong market position as the primary federal resource for digital accessibility compliance, offering comprehensive training, policy information, and accessibility tools such as the Accessibility Requirements Tool (ART). Technically, the website employs modern web technologies including jQuery, the U.S. Web Design System (USWDS), and integrates analytics via Google Tag Manager and the Digital Analytics Program. The site is mobile-optimized, accessible, and well-structured, reflecting a mature digital infrastructure consistent with government standards. Performance is moderate with good SEO and accessibility features. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS with secure external script loading but lacks explicit security headers and a cookie consent mechanism, which are recommended for enhanced security and privacy compliance. No vulnerabilities or sensitive data exposures were detected. WHOIS data is unavailable, likely due to privacy restrictions typical for .gov domains, but the domain's legitimacy is strongly supported by its official branding and content. Overall, Section508.gov demonstrates a high level of professionalism, trustworthiness, and compliance with accessibility standards. Strategic recommendations include implementing explicit security headers, adding cookie consent for privacy compliance, and publishing a formal security policy and incident response contact information to further strengthen its security posture and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching section508.gov

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
55
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
76

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Section508.gov operates as a government essential entity under the General Services Administration, serving the federal sector with digital accessibility compliance resources. Its business model focuses on providing authoritative guidance, training, and tools to federal agencies and vendors, supporting compliance with federal laws. The site benefits from strong government partnerships and a clear target audience, positioning it as a critical resource in the accessibility compliance ecosystem. The absence of commercial advertising and the presence of official government seals reinforce its non-commercial, service-oriented nature. Growth indicators include continuous updates to accessibility standards and training offerings. The partnership ecosystem includes key government bodies such as the U.S. Access Board and other federal initiatives. The site’s strategic operations emphasize compliance, education, and resource dissemination rather than revenue generation, aligning with government service mandates.

Security posture

The website exhibits a solid security posture with mandatory HTTPS encryption and secure loading of external scripts. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options represents an area for improvement. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were identified, and the site does not appear to collect sensitive user data directly, reducing risk exposure. The lack of a cookie consent mechanism and formal security or incident response policies suggests gaps in privacy compliance and incident readiness. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be enhanced by adopting additional security best practices and transparency measures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement explicit security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner or mechanism to comply with privacy regulations and improve user transparency.
  3. Publish a formal security policy and incident response contact information to improve trust and readiness for security incidents.
  4. Regularly review and update third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance WHOIS transparency where possible or provide official domain registration information to improve trust signals.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
General Services Administration
Description
Section508.gov is the official U.S. government resource for ensuring digital accessibility compliance with Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act (29 U.S.C. 794d). It offers comprehensive guidance, tools, and training to help federal agencies and vendors create accessible information and communication technology (ICT) for individuals with disabilities.
Key services
Guidance on Section 508 compliance, Training and tools for accessibility, Accessibility Requirements Tool (ART), Program manager listings, Policy and management resources
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.6.0, USWDS (U.S. Web Design System), Google Tag Manager, Digital Analytics Program (DAP)
Frameworks
USWDS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
excellent
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Secure external script loading with integrity and crossorigin attributes
  • No visible sensitive data exposure

Analytics and tracking

Services
Digital Analytics Program, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Digital Analytics Program
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Official U.S. government website with .gov domain
  2. Comprehensive accessibility resources and training
  3. No visible WHOIS data due to privacy or restricted access
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly listed on homepage; contact form available
  5. No cookie consent banner detected
  6. Uses modern web technologies and USWDS framework
  7. Secure HTTPS connection with external trusted scripts
  8. No signs of malicious or adult content
  9. Strong branding and trust indicators consistent with government sites
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern web technologies including jQuery 3.6.0 and the U.S. Web Design System (USWDS), which ensures compliance with federal accessibility standards and responsive design. Integration with Google Tag Manager and the Digital Analytics Program supports analytics and performance monitoring. The site uses HTTPS exclusively, ensuring encrypted communications. Performance is moderate, with room for optimization in loading speed. The site lacks a detected CMS, suggesting a custom or government-managed platform. Accessibility features are well implemented, including skip navigation links and ARIA labels. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Technical risks are minimal but could be reduced further by adding security headers and cookie consent mechanisms.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with section508.gov. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review section508.gov.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.