Skip to main content

Security report for sdseeruecken.ch

Kompetenzzentrum Soziale Dienste Seerücken · Government · Switzerland

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

75/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Kompetenzzentrum Soziale Dienste Seerücken is a regional government entity providing social services to the communities in the Seerücken area of Switzerland. The website serves as an information hub for residents, offering news, service descriptions, and contact details. It maintains a professional and accessible design, supporting multiple municipalities with links to partner sites. The technical infrastructure includes modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and Font Awesome, and it is built on the GOViS CMS platform. The site is mobile-optimized and implements accessibility best practices. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced, security headers present, and no visible vulnerabilities. Privacy compliance is robust, featuring a comprehensive privacy policy, cookie consent mechanism, and GDPR adherence. Analytics are handled via Matomo, emphasizing privacy. However, the site lacks explicit security policy and incident response contact pages, which could enhance trust and preparedness. Overall, the site is trustworthy, well-maintained, and suitable for its public service role.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching sdseeruecken.ch

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
75
Email security
65
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
75

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website represents a small-sized government sector entity focused on social services within a defined geographic region in Switzerland. Its business model is public service delivery, targeting residents and local communities. The site supports transparency and community engagement through news updates and resource links. Partnerships with local municipalities are evident through external links. The absence of commercial activities or affiliate programs aligns with its government nature. The site’s content and structure suggest a stable, established presence without aggressive marketing or monetization strategies. Growth indicators are not explicit, but the site’s maintenance and policy compliance reflect organizational maturity.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, appropriate security headers, and no exposed sensitive data. The use of modern libraries and frameworks reduces risk from outdated components. Privacy compliance is well addressed with cookie consent and GDPR-aligned privacy policies. However, the absence of a published security policy and incident response contact information represents a gap in transparency and readiness. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files were found, which could be considered best practice for public-facing government sites. Overall, the site is secure but could improve in incident communication and vulnerability management transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and commitments.
  2. Add incident response contact channels such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  3. Implement and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file.
  4. Regularly audit third-party libraries and update to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance security headers with additional directives like Feature-Policy or Permissions-Policy.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Kompetenzzentrum Soziale Dienste Seerücken
Description
Entdecken Sie das Kompetenzzentrum Soziale Dienste Seerücken online. Nehmen Sie unsere Dienstleistungen in Anspruch oder informieren Sie sich über die verschiedenen Bereiche unseres Kompetenzzentrums.
Key services
Social services coordination, Information and support for social issues, Community engagement and events
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.7.1, Font Awesome 6 Pro, GOViS CMS, Magnific Popup
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of modern libraries

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a regional government social services center for Seerücken area in Switzerland
  2. Content is in German (de-CH locale)
  3. Professional and accessible design with clear navigation
  4. Cookie consent and privacy policies are implemented and GDPR compliant
  5. No signs of malicious or suspicious content
  6. Use of Matomo analytics for privacy-respecting tracking
  7. No visible security policy or incident response contact pages
  8. No terms of service page detected
  9. Contact info includes phone, email, and physical address in footer
  10. Multiple external links to partner municipalities and official sites
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the GOViS CMS platform, utilizing jQuery 3.7.1 and Font Awesome 6 Pro for UI elements. It employs Matomo for analytics, favoring privacy. The site uses responsive design techniques with media queries for image loading optimization. Accessibility features such as skip links and ARIA roles are implemented. Performance is moderate, with deferred and async loading of scripts. The site uses a cookie consent management system with granular category controls. No major technical debt or deprecated technologies were detected. Opportunities exist to improve performance by optimizing image delivery further and enhancing caching strategies.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with sdseeruecken.ch. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review sdseeruecken.ch.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.