Skip to main content

Security report for sdhmoravka.cz

SH ČMS – Sbor dobrovolných hasičů Morávka · Government · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SDH Morávka is a volunteer fire brigade organization based in the Czech Republic, providing firefighting, rescue, and civil protection services to the local community. The website serves as an information hub for community members, other fire brigades, and interested parties, offering news, event details, and safety information. The organization is supported by local government and foundations, reflecting a trusted community role. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using modern plugins and themes, with moderate performance and good mobile optimization. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and no visible vulnerabilities, but lacks advanced security headers and formal incident response information. Privacy compliance is limited due to missing privacy and cookie policies and absence of consent mechanisms. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and safe for general audiences, but could improve transparency and compliance aspects.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching sdhmoravka.cz

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention sdhmoravka.cz, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for sdhmoravka.cz right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization operates as a non-profit volunteer fire brigade with a focus on community safety and fire sports. It benefits from regional funding and local partnerships, positioning it as a key local service provider rather than a commercial entity. The website content and structure support community engagement and information dissemination. Revenue streams likely include local government grants and foundation support. The target audience is primarily local residents and other volunteer fire brigades. The site demonstrates consistent branding and good content quality, supporting its role as a trusted community resource.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and uses reputable third-party analytics tools, indicating a baseline security awareness. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and lack of published security policies or incident response contacts suggest room for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The missing WHOIS data reduces transparency and trustworthiness from a domain registration perspective. Privacy compliance is weak, with no visible cookie consent or privacy policy, which could pose regulatory risks. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be enhanced with better policies and technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with explicit user consent mechanisms to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Publish a security.txt file and incident response contact information to facilitate vulnerability reporting and improve transparency.
  4. Regularly audit and update WordPress plugins and themes to mitigate risks from outdated or vulnerable components.
  5. Improve WHOIS transparency or provide domain registration information on the website to increase trustworthiness.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SH ČMS – Sbor dobrovolných hasičů Morávka
Description
Sbor dobrovolných hasičů Morávka is a volunteer fire brigade organization providing fire protection, civil protection, and community services in Morávka, Czech Republic.
Key services
Firefighting and rescue operations, Fire sports events organization, Public safety education, Technical assistance and civil protection, Community event participation
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, JavaScript, Smart Slider 3, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, GeneratePress theme, Roboto font
Frameworks
WordPress CMS
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google Tag Manager and Analytics with async loading

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is in Czech with an English alternate version available.
  3. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap.
  4. Contact information is present but no phone numbers explicitly labeled as company contact.
  5. Use of Google Analytics and Tag Manager indicates user tracking but no explicit consent mechanism found.
  6. WHOIS data is missing, which reduces transparency and trust.
  7. Website uses WordPress CMS with a modern theme and slider plugin.
  8. No security.txt or incident response information found.
  9. No certifications or formal security policies published.
  10. Website content is safe and suitable for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with the GeneratePress theme and Smart Slider 3 plugin, indicating a modern and flexible infrastructure. It uses Google Fonts and Google Analytics for typography and user tracking. The site is mobile optimized and has a clear navigation structure. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of scripts to improve speed. Accessibility features are basic but present. There is no evidence of advanced hosting or CDN usage from the HTML content. The lack of security headers and privacy compliance features are technical gaps. Overall, the technical implementation supports the business needs but could benefit from security and compliance enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with sdhmoravka.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review sdhmoravka.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.