Skip to main content

Security report for sdbata.com

东方律师网 · Other · China

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in Email security, Network security and 3 other checks.

Security score

48/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

东方律师网 is an online Chinese legal consultation platform offering free access to various legal services including family law, criminal defense, debt, real estate, civil litigation, and intellectual property. The website provides legal articles, news, and a lawyer directory aimed at individuals seeking legal advice in China. The platform targets Chinese-speaking users and operates as a small-scale niche legal information provider. Technically, the site uses common JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and bxSlider, and includes Baidu's push script for SEO purposes. The site is mobile optimized with a moderate performance profile but lacks advanced accessibility features. Security posture is weak with no DNSSEC, no visible security headers, and inconsistent WHOIS data that raises trust concerns. Privacy and cookie policies are absent, and no clear contact information is provided, limiting compliance and user trust. Overall, the site is functional and content-rich but requires significant improvements in security, privacy compliance, and transparency to enhance credibility and user confidence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  4. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching sdbata.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
30
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
50
Average
48

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website operates in the legal services sector, focusing on providing free legal consultation and information to Chinese users. Its business model revolves around content provision and lawyer referrals rather than direct legal representation. The platform's market position is that of a specialized online legal resource with a broad range of legal topics covered. The absence of clear business registration details and contact information limits its perceived credibility. The site maintains partnerships or links with various Chinese service and information websites, indicating some ecosystem integration. Growth potential depends on improving trust signals, compliance, and expanding service offerings. Revenue streams are not explicit but may include advertising or lead generation for legal professionals.

Security posture

The website's security maturity is low. The lack of DNSSEC and security headers exposes it to DNS spoofing and clickjacking risks. The WHOIS data inconsistency and future domain creation date suggest possible domain registration issues or data inaccuracies, which could be a red flag. No incident response or security contact information is provided, limiting the ability to report vulnerabilities or incidents. The site uses HTTPS (implied by the URL) but no detailed SSL configuration data is available. Forms are minimal and do not indicate advanced security controls such as CAPTCHA or input validation visible in the HTML. Overall, the site requires enhanced security controls, transparency, and compliance measures to reduce risk.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC and implement comprehensive security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, HSTS).
  2. Publish clear privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies to improve compliance and user trust.
  3. Provide explicit contact information including security incident contacts and data protection officer details.
  4. Validate and correct WHOIS domain registration data to ensure legitimacy and trustworthiness.
  5. Enhance technical infrastructure with modern CMS or frameworks supporting accessibility and performance improvements.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
东方律师网
Description
东方律师网是一个专业免费律师在线咨询平台，提供离婚律师、婚姻律师、刑事律师、债务律师、房产律师、民事诉讼律师、合同律师、劳动律师、医疗律师、交通律师、行政诉讼律师、知识产权律师及律师事务所等服务，支持律师一对一免费咨询。
Key services
Legal consultation, Lawyer directory, Legal articles and news
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 2.2.4, jQuery bxSlider, jQuery SuperSlide, Font Awesome
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
40/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Baidu linksubmit push.js
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a Chinese legal information and consultation platform.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers provided.
  4. Uses common JavaScript libraries and Baidu push script.
  5. No visible security headers or advanced security measures.
  6. WHOIS data is inconsistent and likely inaccurate.
  7. Content is professionally presented and relevant to legal services.
  8. No adult or explicit content detected.
  9. External links include multiple Chinese legal and service-related domains.
  10. No social media links detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a custom or unknown CMS with jQuery 2.2.4 and plugins like bxSlider and SuperSlide for UI components. Font Awesome is used for icons. The site loads Baidu's push.js script for SEO link submission. The HTML is well structured with meta tags for viewport, charset, keywords, and description, supporting SEO. Mobile optimization is good with responsive meta tags and device targeting. However, no modern JavaScript frameworks or CMS platforms like WordPress, Joomla, or Drupal are detected. Hosting provider details are not explicit but the registrar is eName Technology Co., Ltd. Performance is moderate with no explicit speed optimization scripts or CDN usage detected. Accessibility is basic with no ARIA roles or landmarks visible. Overall, the technical stack is functional but dated and could benefit from modernization and security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with sdbata.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review sdbata.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.