Skip to main content

Security report for scoutrfp.com

Workday · Technology · United States

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

82/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Workday is a leading enterprise software company specializing in cloud-based financial management, human capital management, and strategic sourcing solutions. Their strategic sourcing software integrates seamlessly with finance and procurement systems to optimize procurement processes for medium to large enterprises. The website reflects a mature digital presence with comprehensive content, clear navigation, and strong branding consistency. Technically, the site leverages Adobe Experience Manager as its CMS and integrates advanced marketing and analytics tools such as Adobe DTM, Demandbase, and Bing Ads, indicating a sophisticated digital marketing strategy. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforcement, multiple security headers, and no detected vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear privacy and cookie policies and consent mechanisms. The lack of WHOIS data is likely due to registry restrictions and does not detract from the site's legitimacy. Overall, the site demonstrates a high level of professionalism, security, and compliance suitable for an enterprise-grade SaaS provider.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
80/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching scoutrfp.com

This scan found 14 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
82
Security headers
60
Email security
87
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
80
Average
82

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention scoutrfp.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
1,092
Employees
0
Customers
1,092
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
7%

3 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for scoutrfp.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Workday operates in the technology sector with a focus on enterprise SaaS solutions for finance, HR, and procurement. Their market position is strong as a recognized leader in cloud financial and human capital management software. The business model centers on subscription-based software services targeting large and medium enterprises. The company maintains a broad partnership ecosystem including contract management, financial planning, and employee engagement platforms. Growth indicators include extensive resource libraries, customer stories, and a global presence with multi-region language support. Strategic observations highlight Workday's emphasis on integration, innovation, and customer success, supported by a robust digital infrastructure and marketing ecosystem.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and comprehensive security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, and X-Frame-Options. No exposed credentials or sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Forms appear to be securely implemented with no visible vulnerabilities. Privacy policies and cookie consent mechanisms align with GDPR requirements, indicating compliance readiness. However, incident response contact information and vulnerability disclosure policies are not prominently found, suggesting areas for improvement in transparency and readiness. Overall, the security maturity is high, suitable for an enterprise SaaS provider handling sensitive financial and HR data.

Recommendations

  1. Enhance visibility and accessibility of incident response and security contact information on the website.
  2. Implement and publicize a formal vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  3. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  4. Add CSP violation reporting to monitor and respond to content security policy breaches.
  5. Consider publishing data retention policies to improve transparency and compliance posture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Workday
Description
Workday provides strategic sourcing software that integrates with finance and procurement systems to optimize procurement processes.
Key services
Strategic Sourcing Software, Spend Management, Financial Management, Human Capital Management
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Adobe DTM, Coveo Atomic, Demandbase, Bing Ads, Workday proprietary scripts
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Security headers present
  • No exposed sensitive data detected
  • Secure forms with proper input handling

Analytics and tracking

Services
Adobe DTM, Bing Ads, Demandbase
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Bing Ads
Tracking pixels
Adobe DTM, Demandbase
Marketing tools
Adobe DTM, Demandbase, Bing Ads
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and navigation.
  2. No WAF or security challenge detected.
  3. Strong use of enterprise-grade marketing and analytics tools.
  4. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies present.
  5. No exposed sensitive data or security vulnerabilities detected.
  6. WHOIS data unavailable, likely due to registry restrictions.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Adobe Experience Manager, a robust enterprise CMS, and uses modern JavaScript frameworks and libraries including Coveo Atomic for search and Adobe DTM for tag management. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts and deferred resources. Mobile optimization and accessibility are well addressed with responsive design and ARIA attributes. SEO is supported by comprehensive meta tags, Open Graph, and Twitter Card metadata. Hosting details are not explicit but likely enterprise-grade. Technical risks are minimal, though continuous monitoring of third-party integrations is recommended to avoid supply chain vulnerabilities.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with scoutrfp.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review scoutrfp.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.