Skip to main content

Security report for scorpionoffshore.com

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website scorpionoffshore.com is currently a parked domain primarily serving advertising content through Bodis and Google Adsense. There is no active business content, no contact information, and no clear indication of the company or services behind the domain. The domain is long-registered since 2005 but does not reflect an active or professional business presence. Technically, the site uses basic HTML, CSS, and JavaScript with Google Adsense scripts and Bodis domain parking infrastructure. HTTPS is enabled, but no advanced security headers or privacy mechanisms are implemented. The site lacks cookie consent and GDPR compliance indicators. Overall, the security posture is basic with no forms or inputs to secure, but the absence of security headers is a concern. The website quality is poor with minimal content and poor user experience. The domain registration is consistent and public, but the lack of business information reduces trustworthiness. Strategic recommendations include implementing security headers, adding privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms, and developing active business content to improve credibility and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching scorpionoffshore.com

This scan found 22 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
20
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
58

Not counted

  • Email security: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

There is no identifiable business or company information on the website. The domain is parked and monetized through advertising networks. No market positioning, business model, or target audience can be determined. The domain age suggests it was registered long ago but is currently unused for active business purposes. No partnerships or subsidiaries are indicated. The site does not provide any revenue stream information or growth indicators. The business intelligence is minimal due to lack of content.

Security posture

The security posture is basic with HTTPS enabled but no security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, or X-Content-Type-Options detected. No forms or user inputs are present, reducing attack surface. No incident response or security policies are published. GDPR compliance is minimal with only a basic privacy policy and no cookie consent mechanism. The site is vulnerable to clickjacking and MIME sniffing attacks due to missing headers. No known vulnerabilities or malware detected. Overall security maturity is low.

Recommendations

  1. Implement essential security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to improve security posture.
  2. Enable DNSSEC for the domain to enhance DNS security.
  3. Develop and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with explicit consent mechanisms to comply with GDPR.
  4. Add clear business contact information and security policies to improve trust and compliance.
  5. Consider developing active business content or redirecting domain to a legitimate business site to improve credibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
No business description or company information is provided on the website. The site appears to be a parked domain with advertising content.
Content quality
poor
Branding
inconsistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Google Adsense, Bodis Domain Parking
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Adsense, Bodis
Tracking pixels
Google Adsense
Marketing tools
Google Adsense
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is a parked domain with advertising placeholders
  2. No business or contact information provided
  3. No forms or interactive elements present
  4. No security headers detected
  5. HTTPS is enabled but no advanced security features
  6. Privacy policy page exists but is minimal
  7. No cookie consent mechanism present
  8. WHOIS data shows domain is old but no active business content
  9. Advertising is served via Bodis and Google Adsense
  10. No social media or external business links found
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built with basic HTML, CSS, and JavaScript and uses Bodis domain parking services with Google Adsense advertising scripts. The site is hosted on Bodis name servers and uses HTTPS. No CMS or advanced frameworks detected. Performance is moderate with minimal content but no optimization for SEO or accessibility beyond basic standards. Mobile optimization is basic but functional. The site lacks modern technical features and has technical debt in terms of missing security headers and privacy compliance mechanisms.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with scorpionoffshore.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review scorpionoffshore.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.