Skip to main content

Security report for scoreboard-system.com

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website scoreboard-system.com is currently inaccessible beyond a Vercel security checkpoint page that verifies the visitor's browser. This indicates the presence of a Web Application Firewall (WAF) or security mechanism blocking direct access to the site's content. Due to this, no business-related content, contact information, or policies are available for analysis. The domain is registered with Tucows Domains Inc. since 2016 with a long expiry date in 2034, suggesting a legitimate registration history. The site is hosted on the Vercel platform and uses the Astro framework, indicating a modern technical infrastructure. However, the lack of accessible content and absence of privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies limit the ability to assess compliance and business credibility. Security posture cannot be fully evaluated due to missing security headers and SSL details in the provided data. Overall, the site appears to be protected by Vercel's security mechanisms but lacks publicly accessible information to perform a comprehensive analysis.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching scoreboard-system.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
20
Email security
65
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

No business intelligence data is available due to the blocked content. The domain registration is consistent and long-term, but no company name, description, or sector information is present. No contact emails, phone numbers, or social media links are found. The site does not display any marketing or advertising tools, nor does it provide insight into its business model or market position. Without accessible content, it is not possible to determine target audience or key services.

Security posture

The website is protected by a Vercel security checkpoint, which acts as a WAF to prevent unauthorized access or malicious traffic. This is a positive security control but also limits visibility into the site's actual security posture. No security headers or SSL configuration details are available from the data provided. There are no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data, but the lack of accessible content prevents a full security assessment. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is present. The domain WHOIS data shows no privacy protection, which is consistent with a legitimate registration. Overall, the security posture is moderate due to the presence of WAF but incomplete due to lack of further data.

Recommendations

  1. Work with Vercel to allow legitimate traffic and reduce false positives in the security checkpoint to improve user experience.
  2. Publish clear privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies accessible without security challenges.
  3. Add visible contact information including emails and phone numbers for business and security incident response.
  4. Implement and document security headers and ensure HTTPS with valid SSL certificates are properly configured.
  5. Consider adding vulnerability disclosure and security.txt files to improve transparency and trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Vercel detected. Website content is a security checkpoint page by Vercel verifying the browser, indicating WAF/security challenge blocking access to actual content. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Content quality
poor
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Astro, Vercel
Frameworks
Astro
Platforms
Vercel
SEO
poor

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is currently blocked by a Vercel security checkpoint page.
  2. No actual business or service content is accessible.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  4. No contact information or forms detected.
  5. No security headers or SSL configuration details available from provided data.
  6. Domain is registered with a reputable registrar and has a long registration period.
  7. Website uses Astro framework and is hosted on Vercel platform.
  8. No analytics or advertising scripts detected.
  9. No social media or external business links found except vercel.link for security fix.
  10. Content safety is rated safe due to lack of content and no adult material.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses the Astro framework and is hosted on Vercel, indicating a modern and scalable technical infrastructure. The HTML content is minimal and primarily serves as a security checkpoint with JavaScript-based browser verification. No CMS or third-party analytics or advertising scripts are detected. The domain uses multiple Forpsi name servers but DNSSEC is not enabled, which could be improved for DNS security. Performance and mobile optimization cannot be assessed due to blocked content. The site lacks meta tags and SEO optimization visible in the provided HTML. Overall, the technical setup is modern but underutilized due to access restrictions.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with scoreboard-system.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review scoreboard-system.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.