Skip to main content

Security report for scip.es

Soluciones Corporativas IP SL · Technology · Spain

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 2 other checks.

Security score

50/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Soluciones Corporativas IP SL is a small Spanish technology company specializing in connectivity, internet presence, and content solutions through its multi-brand structure including MrDomain, ConectaBalear, and MediaBalear. The company targets businesses and consumers in the Balearic Islands region, offering domain registration, hosting, internet connectivity, and content network services. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with clear navigation and good content quality. Technically, the site uses a traditional JavaScript stack with jQuery and Matomo analytics, but lacks modern security headers and explicit cookie consent mechanisms. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enforced but no advanced policies or incident response information published. WHOIS data is privacy protected, which is common but reduces transparency. Overall, the website is functional and credible but could improve privacy compliance and security practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching scip.es

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
20
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
28
Average
50

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates as a multi-brand group focusing on internet-related services in the Balearic Islands. Its competitive advantage lies in offering integrated services across domain registration, connectivity, and content delivery. The business model is service-oriented with revenue likely from subscriptions and service fees. The target market includes local businesses and internet users. The company maintains a clear partnership ecosystem internally with its brands but no external partners identified. Growth indicators are not explicit but the presence of multiple brands suggests diversification. Strategic observations include the need to enhance digital trust through improved security and privacy transparency.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced, and tracking is limited with Matomo configured to disable cookies, indicating privacy awareness. However, the absence of security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response policies are published, limiting transparency and readiness. The use of older JavaScript libraries like jQuery 1.11.3 may expose the site to known vulnerabilities. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small business but improvements are recommended to meet higher compliance and protection standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a clear cookie consent mechanism to comply with privacy regulations and inform users about tracking.
  2. Add essential security headers including Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection.
  3. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Update JavaScript libraries to current versions to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy and security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Soluciones Corporativas IP SL
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Soluciones Corporativas IP SL
Description
Specialised in the development of connectivity, presence and Internet content solutions
Key services
Domain registration and hosting (MrDomain), Internet connectivity (ConectaBalear), Content network services (MediaBalear)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.11.3, jquery.stellar.min.js, js.cookie.js, Custom JavaScript (script.js), Google Fonts (Playfair Display), Matomo analytics (kiwi.js)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced (implied by URL)
  • No cookies tracking (Matomo configured with disableCookies)
  • No forms detected on homepage

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges
  2. Content is professionally presented with clear multi-brand structure
  3. No forms detected on homepage; contact via email and address only
  4. No explicit cookie consent mechanism despite use of analytics
  5. No visible security headers or advanced security policies published
  6. WHOIS privacy protection used, reducing transparency
  7. Company contact email uses company domain
  8. No social media links found in HTML content
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a traditional front-end stack with jQuery and custom JavaScript, supplemented by Google Fonts and Matomo analytics. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and good navigation clarity. Performance is moderate, with no explicit hosting or CMS detected. The absence of modern frameworks or CMS suggests a custom or lightweight implementation. Accessibility features are basic, and SEO optimization is good with proper meta tags and structured navigation. Technical debt is moderate due to older libraries and missing security headers. Modernization opportunities include upgrading libraries, implementing security best practices, and enhancing privacy compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with scip.es. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review scip.es.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.